On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 01:04:51PM -0600, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com [2011-01-04 09:49]:
* Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net [2010-12-25 16:37]:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:27:45PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:23:12 -0600
Anthony
* Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com [2011-01-04 09:49]:
* Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net [2010-12-25 16:37]:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:27:45PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:23:12 -0600
Anthony Liguori aligu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/08/2010 12:01
* Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net [2010-12-25 16:37]:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:27:45PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:23:12 -0600
Anthony Liguori aligu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/08/2010 12:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Currently, x86_64-softmmu
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:27:45PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:23:12 -0600
Anthony Liguori aligu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/08/2010 12:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M
memsize.
This
On 12/08/2010 12:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine we're
not using kvm
Upstream
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:23:12 -0600
Anthony Liguori aligu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/08/2010 12:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit
on
On 12/08/2010 12:27 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:23:12 -0600
Anthony Liguorialigu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/08/2010 12:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple
