Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com writes:
On 06/04/2010 05:16 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
- protocol: json-array of json-object
Each element object has a member name
- Possible values: file, nbd, ...
Additional members depend on the value of name.
For name = file:
- file: file
On 06/04/2010 05:16 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
- protocol: json-array of json-object
Each element object has a member name
- Possible values: file, nbd, ...
Additional members depend on the value of name.
For name = file:
- file: file name (json-string)
For name = nbd:
Discussion with Christoph and Kevin uncovered yet another issue:
protocols. I find it pretty confusing, but let me try to describe it
anyway; Christoph and Kevin, please correct my errors.
A host block device has a format. A format has a name.
Below the format, it has a stack of protocols. A
Am 04.06.2010 16:16, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Discussion with Christoph and Kevin uncovered yet another issue:
protocols. I find it pretty confusing, but let me try to describe it
anyway; Christoph and Kevin, please correct my errors.
A host block device has a format. A format has a
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 04.06.2010 16:16, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Discussion with Christoph and Kevin uncovered yet another issue:
protocols. I find it pretty confusing, but let me try to describe it
anyway; Christoph and Kevin, please correct my errors.
A host block
Am 04.06.2010 17:53, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 04.06.2010 16:16, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Our abstraction for formats is struct BlockDriver.
Our abstraction for protocols is also struct BlockDriver. Except for
the special protocol file, but that's
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/28/2010 09:21 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
snip, agreed
Summary of the host / guest split:
-drive options host or guest?
bus, unit, if, index, addr guest, already covered by qdev
cyls, heads, secs, trans
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/28/2010 10:24 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
If a password is needed, we should throw an error and let the QMP client
set the password and try again.
It's what we do today, a password should be set with block_passwd before
issuing the change
On 05/31/2010 01:54 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
We expose some of the cache property to the guest. IMO we need the
cache property to be both guest and host, with qemu bridging the
impedance mismatch if needed.
Yes.
How should the device properties look like?
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/31/2010 01:54 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
We expose some of the cache property to the guest. IMO we need the
cache property to be both guest and host, with qemu bridging the
impedance mismatch if needed.
Yes.
How should the device
On Mon, 31 May 2010 13:05:37 +0200
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/28/2010 10:24 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
If a password is needed, we should throw an error and let the QMP client
set the password and try again.
It's what
Am 31.05.2010 15:48, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 13:05:37 +0200
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/28/2010 10:24 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
If a password is needed, we should throw an error and let the QMP client
set the
On 05/28/2010 09:21 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
snip, agreed
Summary of the host / guest split:
-drive options host or guest?
bus, unit, if, index, addr guest, already covered by qdev
cyls, heads, secs, transguest, new qdev properties
On 05/28/2010 10:24 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
If a password is needed, we should throw an error and let the QMP client
set the password and try again.
It's what we do today, a password should be set with block_passwd before
issuing the change command. Otherwise an error is throw.
Am 28.05.2010 20:21, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
I'd like to give posting documentation of new QMP commands for review
before posting code a try. But first let me explain briefly why we need
new commands.
We want a clean separation between host part (blockdev_add) and guest
part
On 05/28/2010 02:13 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 28.05.2010 20:21, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
I'd like to give posting documentation of new QMP commands for review
before posting code a try. But first let me explain briefly why we need
new commands.
We want a clean separation between host
On Fri, 28 May 2010 14:17:07 -0500
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 05/28/2010 02:13 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 28.05.2010 20:21, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
I'd like to give posting documentation of new QMP commands for review
before posting code a try. But first let me
17 matches
Mail list logo
