Adding to this C wrappers for QMP commands threatens to make QMP command
arguments part of the library ABI. Compatible QMP evolution (like
adding an optional argument) turns into a libqmp soname bump.
Counter-productive. How do you plan to avoid that?
.so versioning. Ugly as hell to do
On 03/24/10 00:13, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
- networking: man, setting networking is a mess, libvirt just does it
for you.
+1
Even when not using libvirt for a reason or another I usually hook my
virtual machines into virbr0 (libvirt default network).
I had the opposite
Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Juan Quintela quint...@redhat.com writes:
- networking: man, setting networking is a mess, libvirt just does it
for you.
Agreed it's messy, but isn't this something that the standard qemu
command line tool could potentially do better by itself? I
On 03/24/2010 03:59 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 03/24/10 00:13, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
- networking: man, setting networking is a mess, libvirt just does it
for you.
+1
Even when not using libvirt for a reason or another I usually hook my
virtual machines into virbr0
In practice I've seen this not working correctly in the past, i.e. my
^^^
br0 didn't pop up in the virt-manager nic setup page.
Please file a bug: virt-manager has had bridge detection for years, so
something must be going wrong.
- networking: man, setting networking is a mess, libvirt just does it
for you.
+1
Even when not using libvirt for a reason or another I usually hook my
virtual machines into virbr0 (libvirt default network).
cheers,
Gerd
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
- networking: man, setting networking is a mess, libvirt just does it
for you.
+1
Even when not using libvirt for a reason or another I usually hook my
virtual machines into virbr0 (libvirt default network).
This is a war for another day :-)
I
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:50:57AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
- networking: man, setting networking is a mess, libvirt just does it
for you.
+1
Even when not using libvirt for a reason or another
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:00:21PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/23/2010 06:06 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I thought the monitor protocol *was* our API. If not, why not?
It is. But our API is missing key components like guest enumeration.
So the fundamental topic here is, do we introduce
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
- networking: man, setting networking is a mess, libvirt just does it
for you.
+1
Even when not using libvirt for a reason or another I usually hook my
virtual machines into virbr0 (libvirt default network).
I had the opposite problem. Needed to use multiple
Juan Quintela wrote:
- monitor: I need a way to get to the monitor when going through
libvirt, in the past you couldn't allow this, but now it looks
possible.
Now you can just start another monitor connection to qemu :-)
Previously I've used a multiplexing script which accepts multiple
Juan Quintela quint...@redhat.com writes:
- networking: man, setting networking is a mess, libvirt just does it
for you.
Agreed it's messy, but isn't this something that the standard qemu
command line tool could potentially do better by itself? I don't see why you
need a wrapper for that.
On 03/23/2010 08:23 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:00:21PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/23/2010 06:06 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I thought the monitor protocol *was* our API. If not, why not?
It is. But our API is missing key components like
13 matches
Mail list logo
