Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
/usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd).
What is the way out
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
/usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
(should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0)
Well, the problem is I do not root privileges so
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version
needed?)
(should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0)
Well, the problem is I do
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
Ben Taylor wrote:
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Also, I downloaded the SDL-1.2.11 source from opensolaris.org download
page. I can't figure out how to apply the 64bit patch (patch rejects
the diffs, a visual inspection shows that patch is already applied to the
source?)
-ishwar
Manually applying a patch will
Ben Taylor wrote:
As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
My answer had been a bit longer:
Read ld.so.1(1)
i.e.
# man ld.so.1
Then: *One* option is to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or potentially
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
My answer had been a bit longer:
Read ld.so.1(1)
i.e.
# man ld.so.1
Then: *One*
Ben Taylor wrote:
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
My answer had been a bit longer:
Read ld.so.1(1)
i.e.
# man
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
(should go under
Ben Taylor wrote:
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
(should go under
Ben Taylor wrote:
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path
15 matches
Mail list logo
