On 11/17/2011 06:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:46:37AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
summary of the current
- Original Message -
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
summary of
the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already featureful and
tested, so
let's drop qemu-ga and have everyone adopt ovirt-guest-agent.
What we're suggesting is let's drop
- Original Message -
On 11/16/2011 11:53 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
2) You'd also need a schema, similar to
qemu.git/qapi-schema-guest.json,
to describe the calls you're proxying. The existing infrastructure
in
QEMU
On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
We have another requirement. We need to embed the source for the guest
agent in the QEMU release tarball. This is for GPL compliance since we
want to include an ISO (eventually) that contains binaries.
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
ovirt-guest-agent is
On 11/17/2011 02:59 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 11/16/2011 11:53 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
2) You'd also need a schema, similar to
qemu.git/qapi-schema-guest.json,
to describe the calls you're proxying. The
On 11/17/2011 02:46 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
summary of
the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already featureful and
tested, so
let's drop qemu-ga and have everyone adopt ovirt-guest-agent.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:59:35AM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:16 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
snip
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:46:37AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
summary of the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already featureful
and tested, so let's drop qemu-ga and have everyone
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:46:37AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
summary of the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:46:37AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 22:24:51 Adam Litke wrote:
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
summary of the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already
featureful and tested, so let's drop qemu-ga and have everyone adopt
ovirt-guest-agent.
Not
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:09:10 +0200
Barak Azulay bazu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 22:24:51 Adam Litke wrote:
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
summary of the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already
featureful and tested,
- Original Message -
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
snip
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets
of
requirements
are strictly overlapping or if there
On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulay bazu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
But practically-speaking, it's unavoidable that qemu-specific management
tooling will need to communicate with qemu (via
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:01:00PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the
guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:16:57 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulay bazu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
But practically-speaking, it's unavoidable that
On 15/11/2011 19:33, Alon Levy wrote:
Does it have a seperate system level and user level part in Linux? It
No. The ovirt-guest-agent have only one instance running in the system
level.
Gal.
On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets of
requirements
are strictly overlapping or if there are any
On 11/16/2011 07:39 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
We have another requirement. We need to embed the source for the guest
agent in the QEMU release tarball. This is for GPL compliance since we
want to include an ISO (eventually) that contains binaries.
This
On 11/16/2011 02:07 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:53:45AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
snip
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two
On 11/15/2011 04:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was
about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there,
On 11/16/2011 06:07 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:53:45AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
snip
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two
- Original Message -
On 11/16/2011 07:39 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
We have another requirement. We need to embed the source for the
guest
agent in the QEMU release tarball. This is for GPL compliance
since we
want to include an ISO
On 11/16/2011 02:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/16/2011 07:39 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 11/16/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
We have another requirement. We need to embed the source for the guest
agent in the QEMU release tarball. This is for GPL compliance since we
want to include an
On 11/16/2011 02:16 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
snip
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
collecting requirements. We can then figure out if the two sets
of
requirements
are
On 11/16/2011 06:13 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:16:57 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulaybazu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
But
Hi,
On 11/16/2011 02:47 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/16/2011 06:07 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:53:45AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/15/2011 11:39 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
snip
If you want to talk about convergence, the discussion should start
around
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
On 11/16/2011 06:13 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:16:57 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulaybazu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence summary of
the current argument is: ovirt-guest-agent is already featureful and tested, so
let's drop qemu-ga and have everyone adopt ovirt-guest-agent. Unfortunately,
this track strays completely away from the stated goal of
On 11/16/2011 11:53 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
On 11/16/2011 06:13 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:16:57 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulaybazu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wednesday 16
On 11/16/2011 11:53 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
2) You'd also need a schema, similar to qemu.git/qapi-schema-guest.json,
to describe the calls you're proxying. The existing infrastructure in
QEMU will handle all the work of
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
there, and the need to converge the efforts to a single agent that will serve
On 11/15/2011 12:24 PM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the
guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
there, and the need to
On 11/15/2011 01:01 PM, Perry Myers wrote:
On 11/15/2011 12:24 PM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest
On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
there, and the need to converge
On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
there, and the need to converge
On 11/15/2011 01:08 PM, Subhendu Ghosh wrote:
On 11/15/2011 01:01 PM, Perry Myers wrote:
On 11/15/2011 12:24 PM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about
the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues
- Original Message -
On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was
about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest
On 11/15/2011 11:24 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
Hi,
One of the breakout sessions during the ovirt workshop [1] was about the guest
tools, and focused mainly on the ovirt-guest-agent [2].
One of the issues discussed there, was the various existing guest agents out
there, and the need to converge
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
But practically-speaking, it's unavoidable that qemu-specific management
tooling will need to communicate with qemu (via QMP/libqmp/HMP/etc, or
by proxy via libvirt). It's through those
40 matches
Mail list logo
