On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:28:24AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As with previous Takes of this patch, its purpose is to expose host
+{
+asm(cpuid
+: =a (*ax),
+ =b (*bx),
+ =c (*cx),
+
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:28:24AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As with previous Takes of this patch, its purpose is to expose host
+{
+asm(cpuid
+: =a (*ax),
+ =b (*bx),
+
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:28:24AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As with previous Takes of this patch, its purpose is to expose host
+{
J. Mayer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:28:24AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As with previous Takes of this
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As with previous Takes of this patch, its purpose is to expose host
CPU features to guests. It proved rather helpful to KVM in various
benchmarks, and it should similarly speed kqemu up. Note that it does
not
Avi Kivity wrote:
I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the Qemu
code ?
Imho, all is needed is an implementation of the -cpu option for
x86/x86_64 target. Then, an external tool (even a shell script) can be
used to determine what is the host CPU if you want
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the Qemu
code ?
Imho, all is needed is an implementation of the -cpu option for
x86/x86_64 target. Then, an external tool (even a shell script)
J. Mayer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the Qemu
code ?
Imho, all is needed is an implementation of the -cpu option for
x86/x86_64 target. Then, an
Avi Kivity wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the Qemu
code ?
Imho, all is needed is an implementation of the -cpu option for
x86/x86_64 target.
On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:28:24AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As with previous
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:36 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the Qemu
code ?
Imho, all is needed is an
Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:36 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the
Paul Brook wrote:
Indeed for regular qemu this is useless. But it is useful for kqemu
(for which there is support in mainline qemu), and for kvm (which we
hope to merge one day).
And, as discussed before, it should be asking the hypervisor what features it
supports instead of trying to
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:07:44PM +0200, Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
So, running qemu without any parameters would use host capabilities if
kvm is available and the default qemu cpu if not. The -cpu option can
be used to override this if necessary.
Well, it may be needed to integrate the -cpu
Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
Well, it may be needed to integrate the -cpu host option.
But I think it's a really bad idea that running qemu without the -cpu
option would not act the same on different host. When I want to test
qemu with the same command line, I want it to behave exactly the same,
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
Well, it may be needed to integrate the -cpu host option.
But I think it's a really bad idea that running qemu without the -cpu
option would not act the same on different host. When I want to test
qemu with the same command line, I want it to behave
16 matches
Mail list logo
