CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Jocelyn Mayer j_mayer 07/11/05 13:01:41
Modified files:
. : host-utils.c
Log message:
Code used by the linux-user targets should not use vl.h.
Include exec.h instead.
CVSWeb URLs:
On 10/24/07, Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- SPARC and Alpha look like they will break on 32bit hosts, they should
do multiplications the same way as the other 64bit targets.
I can't see how Sparc would break: smul and umul perform 32x32-64 bit
multiplications, Sparc64 mulx does
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 10/24/07, Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- SPARC and Alpha look like they will break on 32bit hosts, they should
do multiplications the same way as the other 64bit targets.
I can't see how Sparc would break: smul and umul perform 32x32-64 bit
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Thiemo Seufer ths 07/10/26 22:35:02
Modified files:
. : host-utils.c
target-i386: helper.c
target-mips: op.c
Log message:
The other half of the mul64 rework. Sorry for
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Thiemo Seufer ths 07/10/25 23:00:04
Modified files:
. : host-utils.c
Log message:
Restore a more maintainable version of the 64bit multiply code.
CVSWeb URLs:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:37 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:20 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I strongly suggest to reuse my code which was in target-i386/helper.c
revision 1.80 which was far easier to validate. Moreover,
I strongly suggest to reuse my code which was in target-i386/helper.c
revision 1.80 which was far easier to validate. Moreover, integer
divisions from target-i386/helper.c should be put in the same file.
Regards,
Fabrice.
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:20 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I strongly suggest to reuse my code which was in target-i386/helper.c
revision 1.80 which was far easier to validate. Moreover, integer
divisions from target-i386/helper.c should be put in the same file.
I fully agree with this. I
J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:20 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I strongly suggest to reuse my code which was in target-i386/helper.c
revision 1.80 which was far easier to validate. Moreover, integer
divisions from target-i386/helper.c should be put in the same file.
I
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:37 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:20 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I strongly suggest to reuse my code which was in target-i386/helper.c
revision 1.80 which was far easier to validate. Moreover, integer
divisions from
Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:37 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:20 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I strongly suggest to reuse my code which was in target-i386/helper.c
revision 1.80 which was far easier to validate. Moreover, integer
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:37 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:20 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I strongly suggest to reuse my code which was in target-i386/helper.c
revision 1.80 which was far easier to validate. Moreover, integer
divisions from
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Thiemo Seufer ths 07/10/23 23:22:54
Modified files:
. : host-utils.c
Log message:
Fix overflow when multiplying two large positive numbers.
CVSWeb URLs:
13 matches
Mail list logo