I'm not quite sure I understand the point.
Let's see all the picture of async snapshot: our goal is to minimize a VM
downtime during the snapshot.
When we do async snapshot we save vmstate except RAM when a VM is stopped
using the current L1 table (further initial L1 table). Then, we want the
On 5/19/20 10:48 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
The other options is doing what you suggested. There is nothing in the
qcow2 on-disk format that would prevent this, but we would have to
extend the qcow2 driver to allow I/O to inactive L1 tables. This sounds
like a non-trivial amount of
19.05.2020 18:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 19.05.2020 um 17:05 hat Denis Plotnikov geschrieben:
On 19.05.2020 17:18, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 19.05.2020 um 15:54 hat Denis Plotnikov geschrieben:
On 19.05.2020 15:32, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
14.05.2020 17:26, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am
Am 19.05.2020 um 17:05 hat Denis Plotnikov geschrieben:
> On 19.05.2020 17:18, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 19.05.2020 um 15:54 hat Denis Plotnikov geschrieben:
> > >
> > > On 19.05.2020 15:32, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > > > 14.05.2020 17:26, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > > Am 14.05.2020 um
On 19.05.2020 17:18, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 19.05.2020 um 15:54 hat Denis Plotnikov geschrieben:
On 19.05.2020 15:32, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
14.05.2020 17:26, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 14.05.2020 um 15:21 hat Thomas Lamprecht geschrieben:
On 5/12/20 4:43 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 19.05.2020 um 15:54 hat Denis Plotnikov geschrieben:
>
>
> On 19.05.2020 15:32, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > 14.05.2020 17:26, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 14.05.2020 um 15:21 hat Thomas Lamprecht geschrieben:
> > > > On 5/12/20 4:43 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > > Stefan (Reiter),
On 19.05.2020 15:32, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
14.05.2020 17:26, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 14.05.2020 um 15:21 hat Thomas Lamprecht geschrieben:
On 5/12/20 4:43 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Stefan (Reiter), after looking a bit closer at this, I think there
is no
bug in QEMU, but the bug is
14.05.2020 17:26, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 14.05.2020 um 15:21 hat Thomas Lamprecht geschrieben:
On 5/12/20 4:43 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Stefan (Reiter), after looking a bit closer at this, I think there is no
bug in QEMU, but the bug is in your coroutine code that calls block
layer functions
Am 14.05.2020 um 15:21 hat Thomas Lamprecht geschrieben:
> On 5/12/20 4:43 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Stefan (Reiter), after looking a bit closer at this, I think there is no
> > bug in QEMU, but the bug is in your coroutine code that calls block
> > layer functions without moving into the right
On 5/12/20 4:43 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Stefan (Reiter), after looking a bit closer at this, I think there is no
> bug in QEMU, but the bug is in your coroutine code that calls block
> layer functions without moving into the right AioContext first. I've
> written this series anyway as it
Stefan (Reiter), after looking a bit closer at this, I think there is no
bug in QEMU, but the bug is in your coroutine code that calls block
layer functions without moving into the right AioContext first. I've
written this series anyway as it potentially makes the life of callers
easier and would
11 matches
Mail list logo