Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] util: Add thread-safe qemu_strerror() function

2023-03-30 Thread Alex Bennée
Yohei Kojima writes: > Add qemu_strerror() which follows the POSIX specification for > strerror(). While strerror() is not guaranteed to be thread-safe, this > function is thread-safe. > > This function is added to solve the following issue: > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/416

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] util: Add thread-safe qemu_strerror() function

2023-03-30 Thread Alex Bennée
Yohei Kojima writes: > Add qemu_strerror() which follows the POSIX specification for > strerror(). While strerror() is not guaranteed to be thread-safe, this > function is thread-safe. > > This function is added to solve the following issue: > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/416

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] util: Add thread-safe qemu_strerror() function

2023-03-14 Thread Yohei Kojima
I'm sorry for sending ill-formed thread twice. This problem was because the SMTP server overwrites Message-ID, and git-sendemail does not reflect it to In-Reply-To: and Reply-To: in the header. I will test well before sending the next patch. The original cover letter was

[RFC PATCH v2 1/2] util: Add thread-safe qemu_strerror() function

2023-03-14 Thread Yohei Kojima
Add qemu_strerror() which follows the POSIX specification for strerror(). While strerror() is not guaranteed to be thread-safe, this function is thread-safe. This function is added to solve the following issue: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/416 Signed-off-by: Yohei Kojima ---