On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:35:34AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:47:14AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:55:34PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
> > > Make virtio-fs take into account server capabilities.
> > >
> > > Just returning requested
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:47:14AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:55:34PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
> > Make virtio-fs take into account server capabilities.
> >
> > Just returning requested features assumes they all of then are implemented
> > by server and results
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:43:16PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 09:21:54AM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
> >
> > On 09/04/2021 18:56, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:55:34PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
> > > > Make virtio-fs take into account server
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 09:21:54AM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2021 18:56, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:55:34PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
> > > Make virtio-fs take into account server capabilities.
> > >
> > > Just returning requested features assumes they all
On 09/04/2021 18:56, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:55:34PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
Make virtio-fs take into account server capabilities.
Just returning requested features assumes they all of then are implemented
by server and results in setting unsupported configuration if
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:55:34PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
> Make virtio-fs take into account server capabilities.
>
> Just returning requested features assumes they all of then are implemented
> by server and results in setting unsupported configuration if some of them
> are absent.
>
>
