Jamie Lokier wrote:
Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
Well, it may be needed to integrate the "-cpu host" option.
But I think it's a really bad idea that running qemu without the -cpu
option would not act the same on different host. When I want to test
qemu with the same command line, I want it to behave
Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
> Well, it may be needed to integrate the "-cpu host" option.
> But I think it's a really bad idea that running qemu without the -cpu
> option would not act the same on different host. When I want to test
> qemu with the same command line, I want it to behave exactly the same,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:07:44PM +0200, Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
> > So, running qemu without any parameters would use host capabilities if
> > kvm is available and the default qemu cpu if not. The -cpu option can
> > be used to override this if necessary.
>
> Well, it may be needed to integrate th
Paul Brook wrote:
Indeed for regular qemu this is useless. But it is useful for kqemu
(for which there is support in mainline qemu), and for kvm (which we
hope to merge one day).
And, as discussed before, it should be asking the hypervisor what features it
supports instead of trying to g
Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:36 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:36 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the Qemu
> cod
On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:28:24AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Avi Kivity wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the Qemu
code ?
Imho, all is needed is an implementation of the -cpu option for
x86/x86_64 target. Th
J. Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>
>
>
I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the Qemu
code ?
Imho, all is needed is an implementation of the -cpu option for
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:40 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the Qemu
> >> code ?
> >> Imho, all is needed is an implementation of the -cpu option for
> >> x86/x86_64 target. Then, an external tool (e
Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> I've got a remark about this: why this has to be added to the Qemu
>> code ?
>> Imho, all is needed is an implementation of the -cpu option for
>> x86/x86_64 target. Then, an external tool (even a shell script) can be
>> used to determine what is the host CP
J. Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:28:24AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi,
On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:28:24AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> As with previous "Takes" of this patch, its purpose
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:28:24AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> As with previous "Takes" of this patch, its purpose is to expose host
>>> +{
>>> +asm("cpuid"
>>> +: "=a" (*
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:28:24AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/09/2007, Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As with previous "Takes" of this patch, its purpose is to expose host
> > +{
> > +asm("cpuid"
> > +: "=a" (*ax),
> > + "=b" (*bx),
> > +
15 matches
Mail list logo
