On 2019/12/4 2:54, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/3/19 11:52 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> It's just a memory leak, but it's a regression in 4.2.
>>
>> Should we take it into 4.2?
>
> Sorry, I was on holiday and then jury service, so I missed any chance at
> getting this into -rc3.
On 12/3/19 12:54 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/3/19 11:52 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
It's just a memory leak, but it's a regression in 4.2.
Should we take it into 4.2?
Sorry, I was on holiday and then jury service, so I missed any chance at
getting this into -rc3. The memory
On 12/3/19 11:52 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
It's just a memory leak, but it's a regression in 4.2.
Should we take it into 4.2?
Sorry, I was on holiday and then jury service, so I missed any chance at
getting this into -rc3. The memory leak only happens on failure, and
you'd
It's just a memory leak, but it's a regression in 4.2.
Should we take it into 4.2?
29.11.2019 10:25, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: PanNengyuan
>
> In currently implementation there will be a memory leak when
> nbd_client_connect() returns error status. Here is an easy way to
>
