Add ISEE IGEPv2 board definition (an OMAP3730 based board).
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@dowhile0.org
---
Makefile.target |2 +-
hw/igep.c | 123 +++
2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11 January 2012 08:43, Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@dowhile0.org
wrote:
Add ISEE IGEPv2 board definition (an OMAP3730 based board).
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@dowhile0.org
Hello Peter
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11 January 2012 11:53, Javier Martinez Canillas jav...@dowhile0.org
wrote:
Yes, the IGEPv2 and the Overo are indeed very similar machines so we
base the hardware modeling on the Overo.
The only differences
o wrapping the line nicely.
>
> Not sure which maintainer will pick up the patch, but I think they can
> fix up this typo on their end (assuming no other reviewer asks for v3).
>
> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
>
It seems this patch was never picked.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement
Red Hat
Max
platform pkg (Vlv2TbltDevicePkg) as references to fTPM and a FTPM_ENABLE var to
enable it, but IIUC the fTPM driver is distributed as proprietary binary files:
https://firmware.intel.com/projects/minnowboard-max
> I think TIS+Cancel / dTPM is the best match: the emulated TPM has to
> be implemented in virtual hardware (not just faked within the guest,
> in RAM), so that QEMU can secure the sensitive stuff from guest
> kernel level access.
>
Agreed.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement
Red Hat
On 06/29/2017 06:09 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 06/29/2017 08:39 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[snip]
>>
>>> = TPM backend devices =
>>>
>>> The TPM implementation is split into two parts. The one part is the hardware
>>> interface, su
quot; field as specified in "TCG ACPI
Specification Family 1.2 and 2.0 Version 1.2, Revision 8 February 27, 2017"
https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TCG_ACPIGeneralSpecification-Family-1.2-and-2.0-Ver1.2-Rev8_public-reviepdf
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement
Red Hat
you mean that in the past Linux exposed the securityfs files with the event
logs for TPM2 chips as well? My understanding is that Linux does the correct
thing now, since as mentioned the TCPA table should only be used for TPM1.2.
There are patches posted to add Linux support to read the event logs for
hat
is the correct thing to do for this patch.
The doc itself looks great to me and it clarifies a lot about
cursor hotspots.
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Michael Banack writes:
Hello Michael,
> Yes, that patch should be:
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Banack
>
Great, thanks for the confirmation.
> --Michael Banack
>
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Simon Ser writes:
Hello Simon,
> On Wednesday, November 22nd, 2023 at 13:49, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>
>> Any objections to merge the series ?
>
> No objections from me :)
>
Perfect, I'll merge this series then to unblock the mutter MR. Thanks again!
-
tspot properties from cursor planes
> drm/virtio: Use the hotspot properties from cursor planes
> drm: Remove legacy cursor hotspot code
> drm: Introduce DRM_CLIENT_CAP_CURSOR_PLANE_HOTSPOT
>
Pushed to drm-misc (drm-misc-next). Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
ct link:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/3337
The mutter chages are already in good shape and the MR has even be
approved by a mutter developer. Any objections to merge the series ?
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
13 matches
Mail list logo
