On 28.04.20 11:17, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 28.04.2020 12:06, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 25.03.20 14:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Simple movement without any change. It's needed for the following
>>> patch, as this function will need to use some staff which is currently
>>
On 25.03.20 14:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Simple movement without any change. It's needed for the following
> patch, as this function will need to use some staff which is currently
*stuff
> below it.
Wouldn’t it be simpler to just declare block_copy_task_entry()?
Max
>
28.04.2020 12:06, Max Reitz wrote:
On 25.03.20 14:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Simple movement without any change. It's needed for the following
patch, as this function will need to use some staff which is currently
*stuff
below it.
Wouldn’t it be simpler to just declare
Simple movement without any change. It's needed for the following
patch, as this function will need to use some staff which is currently
below it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
---
block/block-copy.c | 66 +++---
1 file changed, 33