Re: [PULL 30/30] multifd: Allocate uint64_t instead of ram_addr_t

2020-01-14 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:39:26PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > We receive that value over the network, and ram_addr_t depends of > architecture. Just make enough space for 64bit. > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela > --- > migration/ram.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

[PULL 30/30] multifd: Allocate uint64_t instead of ram_addr_t

2020-01-14 Thread Juan Quintela
We receive that value over the network, and ram_addr_t depends of architecture. Just make enough space for 64bit. Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela --- migration/ram.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c index d0940387d1..ba6e0eea15 1