On Thu, Jan 14, 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> This patch look ok, but is missing a Signed-off-by:
Attaching a rebased patch with a Signed-off-by. [ I didn't retest, but
it applied without any merge issue and there was only two
(arch-specific) commits in linux-user since the previous version. ]
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:39:21PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hey there
>
> This patch for linux-user adapts the output of the emulated uname()
> syscall to match the configured CPU. Tested with x86, x86-64 and arm
> emulation.
This patch look ok, but is missing a Signed-off-by:
Aur
Hi,
Works great, thanks.
Acked-By: Riku Voipio
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:39:21PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hey there
>
> This patch for linux-user adapts the output of the emulated uname()
> syscall to match the configured CPU. Tested with x86, x86-64 and arm
> emulation.
>
>
Hey there
This patch for linux-user adapts the output of the emulated uname()
syscall to match the configured CPU. Tested with x86, x86-64 and arm
emulation.
Thanks,
---
Makefile.target|2 +-
linux-user/cpu-uname.c | 72 +
