On Mon, 03/12 18:17, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Mon, 03/12 15:11, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> >> Hi Fam,
> >>
> >> It would be great if patchew could run the debug/sanitizer build.
> >> Unfortunately, except x86 target, the run is ful
Hi
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, 03/12 15:11, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> Hi Fam,
>>
>> It would be great if patchew could run the debug/sanitizer build.
>> Unfortunately, except x86 target, the run is full of ASAN leaks or
>> warnings.
>>
>> Do you think patchew cou
On Mon, 03/12 15:11, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi Fam,
>
> It would be great if patchew could run the debug/sanitizer build.
> Unfortunately, except x86 target, the run is full of ASAN leaks or
> warnings.
>
> Do you think patchew could learn to do regression testing? By that I
> mean that patch
Hi Fam,
It would be great if patchew could run the debug/sanitizer build.
Unfortunately, except x86 target, the run is full of ASAN leaks or
warnings.
Do you think patchew could learn to do regression testing? By that I
mean that patchew could compare a patchset output with the current
master (th
Since --enable-debug no longer enable sanitizers, we need explicit
--enable-sanitizers.
llvm package is required for llvm-symbolizer, to get symbols in
backtraces.
Add make V=1 to get details about failing tests.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
---
tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker | 2 +
