Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 10/08/2017 18:36, Markus Armbruster wrote:
+while (!QSIMPLEQ_EMPTY(&oo_queue)) {
+ObjectOptionsQueueEntry *e = QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&oo_queue);
+
+QSIMPLEQ_REMOVE_HEAD(&oo_queue, entry);
+qapi_free_ObjectOptions(e->oo);
>>>
On 10/08/2017 18:36, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> +while (!QSIMPLEQ_EMPTY(&oo_queue)) {
>>> +ObjectOptionsQueueEntry *e = QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&oo_queue);
>>> +
>>> +QSIMPLEQ_REMOVE_HEAD(&oo_queue, entry);
>>> +qapi_free_ObjectOptions(e->oo);
>>> +g_free(e);
>>> +}
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 10/08/2017 14:25, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
>> Dan Berrange tried in "[PATCH v4 00/10]Provide a QOM-based
>> authorization API". Review led to the conclusion that we need to
>> replace rather than add
Eric Blake writes:
> On 08/10/2017 07:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
>> Dan Berrange tried in "[PATCH v4 00/10]Provide a QOM-based
>> authorization API". Review led to the conclusion that we need to
>> replace rather than add
On 10/08/2017 14:25, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
> Dan Berrange tried in "[PATCH v4 00/10]Provide a QOM-based
> authorization API". Review led to the conclusion that we need to
> replace rather than add to QemuOpts. Initial work to
On 08/10/2017 07:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
> Dan Berrange tried in "[PATCH v4 00/10]Provide a QOM-based
> authorization API". Review led to the conclusion that we need to
> replace rather than add to QemuOpts. Initial work
We've wanted -object to support non-scalar properties for a while.
Dan Berrange tried in "[PATCH v4 00/10]Provide a QOM-based
authorization API". Review led to the conclusion that we need to
replace rather than add to QemuOpts. Initial work towards that goal
has been merged to provide -blockdev (
