On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:54:18 +
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:08:57PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:08:18 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:41:03PM +0100, Greg
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:08:57PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:08:18 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:41:03PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
>
>
>
> > >
> > > It breaks migration of pre-2.7 machine types with unusual CPU
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:08:18 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:41:03PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >
> > It breaks migration of pre-2.7 machine types with unusual CPU topologies,
> > but I guess this is an acceptable trade-off.
>
> No, not
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:41:03PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> XICS needs to know the highest VCPU id that may be presented to the
> guest plus 1. Commit f303f117fec3 "spapr: ensure we have at least one
> XICS server" changed how the maximum is computed from:
>
> smp_cpus *
XICS needs to know the highest VCPU id that may be presented to the
guest plus 1. Commit f303f117fec3 "spapr: ensure we have at least one
XICS server" changed how the maximum is computed from:
smp_cpus * kvmppc_smt_threads() / smp_threads
to:
DIV_ROUND_UP(smp_cpus *