On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 07:41:34PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > > shutdown() is safe, in that it
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > shutdown() is safe, in that it stops any other threads accessing the fd
> > > > but doesn't allow it's
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > shutdown() is safe, in that it stops any other threads accessing the fd
> > > but doesn't allow it's reallocation until the close; We perform the
> > > close only when
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 01:51:43PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > > * Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 01:51:43PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:43:27PM
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 01:51:43PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:43:27PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > We don't really have a return path for the other
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 01:51:43PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:43:27PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > We don't really have a return path for the other types yet. Let's check
> > > this when .get_return_path()
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:25:38AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:43:27PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > We don't really have a return path for the other types yet. Let's check
> > > this when .get_return_path() is
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:43:27PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > We don't really have a return path for the other types yet. Let's check
> > this when .get_return_path() is called.
> >
> > For this, we introduce a new feature bit, and set it up
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:51:43PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:25:38AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:43:27PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > We don't really have a return path for the other types yet. Let's check
> > > this when
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:30:10AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:25:38AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:43:27PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > We don't really have a return path for the other types yet. Let's check
> > > this when
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:25:38AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:43:27PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > We don't really have a return path for the other types yet. Let's check
> > this when .get_return_path() is called.
> >
> > For this, we introduce a new feature bit,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:25:38AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:43:27PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > We don't really have a return path for the other types yet. Let's check
> > this when .get_return_path() is called.
> >
> > For this, we introduce a new feature bit,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:43:27PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> We don't really have a return path for the other types yet. Let's check
> this when .get_return_path() is called.
>
> For this, we introduce a new feature bit, and set it up only for socket
> typed IO channels.
>
> This will help detect
We don't really have a return path for the other types yet. Let's check
this when .get_return_path() is called.
For this, we introduce a new feature bit, and set it up only for socket
typed IO channels.
This will help detect earlier failure for postcopy, e.g., logically
speaking postcopy cannot
15 matches
Mail list logo