RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCHv3 00/13] Adding comprehensive support for i.MX8MM EVK board

2025-12-02 Thread Gaurav Sharma



> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Maydell 
> Sent: 02 December 2025 15:14
> To: Gaurav Sharma 
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCHv3 00/13] Adding comprehensive support for
> i.MX8MM EVK board
> 
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
> this email' button
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 05:19, Gaurav Sharma 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > At least some of these patches were reviewed by Philippe in v1.
> > > Did they all change?
> > >
> > > The way this is supposed to work is that where a patch has been
> > > reviewed and hasn't changed in a followup respin of a patchset, you
> > > keep the reviewed-by tag, which tells us that we don't need to
> > > repeat that bit of the review. More detail:
> > >
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
> > >
> w.q%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cgaurav.sharma_7%40nxp.com%7C5426ed39023f
> 453ab8
> > >
> 5908de31875150%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C63
> 900265
> > >
> 4453250191%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIl
> YiOiIwL
> > >
> jAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7
> C%7
> > >
> C%7C&sdata=5MI2GF5C0W%2Fwuyoysgtn4m%2BZQSMrEALcRtZhTxjchcs%3D
> &reserv
> > > ed=0
> > > emu.org%2Fdocs%2Fmaster%2Fdevel%2Fsubmitting-a-
> patch.html%23proper-
> > > use-of-reviewed-by-tags-can-aid-
> > >
> review&data=05%7C02%7Cgaurav.sharma_7%40nxp.com%7C7d7d9203ac334
> > >
> 65757c908de3116f632%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%
> > >
> 7C639002171850292201%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGki
> > >
> OnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoy
> > >
> fQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Bj2Q4APWnTNTY%2FTHqfaEZsmBJH
> > > E%2FzD6zsv%2BxnZ9IyC4%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
> > The v1 patch files reviewed by Philippe changed. Structure type was
> changed in all those reviewed patches that's why reviewed-by tag was not
> retained in the follow-up revisions.
> 
> Generally, if somebody says "do this trivial change X"
> and then gives an R-by tag, they mean "if you do this thing and nothing else
> then you can add my tag to it".
> 

Got it.



Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCHv3 00/13] Adding comprehensive support for i.MX8MM EVK board

2025-12-02 Thread Peter Maydell
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 05:19, Gaurav Sharma  wrote:
>
>
> > At least some of these patches were reviewed by Philippe in v1.
> > Did they all change?
> >
> > The way this is supposed to work is that where a patch has been reviewed
> > and hasn't changed in a followup respin of a patchset, you keep the
> > reviewed-by tag, which tells us that we don't need to repeat that bit of the
> > review. More detail:
> >
> > https://www.q/
> > emu.org%2Fdocs%2Fmaster%2Fdevel%2Fsubmitting-a-patch.html%23proper-
> > use-of-reviewed-by-tags-can-aid-
> > review&data=05%7C02%7Cgaurav.sharma_7%40nxp.com%7C7d7d9203ac334
> > 65757c908de3116f632%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C639002171850292201%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGki
> > OnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoy
> > fQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Bj2Q4APWnTNTY%2FTHqfaEZsmBJH
> > E%2FzD6zsv%2BxnZ9IyC4%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
> The v1 patch files reviewed by Philippe changed. Structure type was changed 
> in all those reviewed patches that's why reviewed-by tag was not retained in 
> the follow-up revisions.

Generally, if somebody says "do this trivial change X"
and then gives an R-by tag, they mean "if you do this
thing and nothing else then you can add my tag to it".

thanks
-- PMM



RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCHv3 00/13] Adding comprehensive support for i.MX8MM EVK board

2025-12-01 Thread Gaurav Sharma


> At least some of these patches were reviewed by Philippe in v1.
> Did they all change?
>
> The way this is supposed to work is that where a patch has been reviewed
> and hasn't changed in a followup respin of a patchset, you keep the
> reviewed-by tag, which tells us that we don't need to repeat that bit of the
> review. More detail:
>
> https://www.q/
> emu.org%2Fdocs%2Fmaster%2Fdevel%2Fsubmitting-a-patch.html%23proper-
> use-of-reviewed-by-tags-can-aid-
> review&data=05%7C02%7Cgaurav.sharma_7%40nxp.com%7C7d7d9203ac334
> 65757c908de3116f632%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%
> 7C639002171850292201%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGki
> OnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoy
> fQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Bj2Q4APWnTNTY%2FTHqfaEZsmBJH
> E%2FzD6zsv%2BxnZ9IyC4%3D&reserved=0
>

The v1 patch files reviewed by Philippe changed. Structure type was changed in 
all those reviewed patches that's why reviewed-by tag was not retained in the 
follow-up revisions.