Re: [PATCH 02/11] migration/hmp: Fix postcopy-blocktime per-vCPU results

2025-05-28 Thread Peter Xu
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 03:08:38PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Markus Armbruster ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Peter Xu  writes:
> > 
> > > Unfortunately, it was never correctly shown..
> > >
> > > This is only found when I started to look into making the blocktime 
> > > feature
> > > more useful (so as to avoid using bpftrace, even though I'm not sure which
> > > one will be harder to use..).
> > >
> > > So the old dump would look like this:
> > >
> > >   Postcopy vCPU Blocktime: 0-1,4,10,21,33,46,48,59
> > >
> > > Even though there're actually 40 vcpus, and the string will merge same
> > > elements and also sort them.
> > >
> > > To fix it, simply loop over the uint32List manually.  Now it looks like:
> > >
> > >   Postcopy vCPU Blocktime (ms):
> > >[15, 0, 0, 43, 29, 34, 36, 29, 37, 41,
> > > 33, 37, 45, 52, 50, 38, 40, 37, 40, 49,
> > > 40, 35, 35, 35, 81, 19, 18, 19, 18, 30,
> > > 22, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
> > >
> > > Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert 
> > > Cc: Alexey Perevalov 
> > > Cc: Markus Armbruster 
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu 
> > > ---
> > >  migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c | 23 ++-
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c 
> > > b/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
> > > index 367ff6037f..3cf890b887 100644
> > > --- a/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
> > > +++ b/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
> > > @@ -208,15 +208,20 @@ void hmp_info_migrate(Monitor *mon, const QDict 
> > > *qdict)
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  if (info->has_postcopy_vcpu_blocktime) {
> > > -Visitor *v;
> > > -char *str;
> > > -v = string_output_visitor_new(false, &str);
> > > -visit_type_uint32List(v, NULL, &info->postcopy_vcpu_blocktime,
> > > -  &error_abort);
> > > -visit_complete(v, &str);
> > > -monitor_printf(mon, "Postcopy vCPU Blocktime: %s\n", str);
> > > -g_free(str);
> > > -visit_free(v);
> > > +uint32List *item = info->postcopy_vcpu_blocktime;
> > > +int count = 0;
> > > +
> > > +monitor_printf(mon, "Postcopy vCPU Blocktime (ms): \n [");
> > > +
> > > +while (item) {
> > > +monitor_printf(mon, "%"PRIu32", ", item->value);
> > > +item = item->next;
> > > +/* Each line 10 vcpu results, newline if there's more */
> > 
> > The list can be arbitrarily long?
> 
> One per vCPU, so a small arbitrary.
> 
> > > +if ((++count % 10 == 0) && item) {
> > > +monitor_printf(mon, "\n  ");
> > > +}
> > > +}
> > > +monitor_printf(mon, "\b\b]\n");
> > 
> > Uh, backspace?
> 
> Agreed!

Agreed on.. using backspace? :)

> 
> Dave
> 
> > I usually do something like
> > 
> > sep = "";
> > for (...) {
> > printf("%s...", sep, ...);
> > sep = ", "
> > }
> > 
> > To add line breaks, I'd use something like
> > 
> > sep = ... ? ", " : ",\n";

Thanks for the suggestion!  Definitely better..

I'll squash below into this patch when repost, comments on top always
welcomed.

diff --git a/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c b/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
index 3cf890b887..6c36e202a0 100644
--- a/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
+++ b/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
@@ -209,19 +209,18 @@ void hmp_info_migrate(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
 
 if (info->has_postcopy_vcpu_blocktime) {
 uint32List *item = info->postcopy_vcpu_blocktime;
+const char *sep = "";
 int count = 0;
 
 monitor_printf(mon, "Postcopy vCPU Blocktime (ms): \n [");
 
 while (item) {
-monitor_printf(mon, "%"PRIu32", ", item->value);
+monitor_printf(mon, "%s%"PRIu32, sep, item->value);
 item = item->next;
 /* Each line 10 vcpu results, newline if there's more */
-if ((++count % 10 == 0) && item) {
-monitor_printf(mon, "\n  ");
-}
+sep = ((++count % 10 == 0) && item) ? ",\n  " : ", ";
 }
-monitor_printf(mon, "\b\b]\n");
+monitor_printf(mon, "]\n");
 }

-- 
Peter Xu




Re: [PATCH 02/11] migration/hmp: Fix postcopy-blocktime per-vCPU results

2025-05-28 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Markus Armbruster ([email protected]) wrote:
> Peter Xu  writes:
> 
> > Unfortunately, it was never correctly shown..
> >
> > This is only found when I started to look into making the blocktime feature
> > more useful (so as to avoid using bpftrace, even though I'm not sure which
> > one will be harder to use..).
> >
> > So the old dump would look like this:
> >
> >   Postcopy vCPU Blocktime: 0-1,4,10,21,33,46,48,59
> >
> > Even though there're actually 40 vcpus, and the string will merge same
> > elements and also sort them.
> >
> > To fix it, simply loop over the uint32List manually.  Now it looks like:
> >
> >   Postcopy vCPU Blocktime (ms):
> >[15, 0, 0, 43, 29, 34, 36, 29, 37, 41,
> > 33, 37, 45, 52, 50, 38, 40, 37, 40, 49,
> > 40, 35, 35, 35, 81, 19, 18, 19, 18, 30,
> > 22, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
> >
> > Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert 
> > Cc: Alexey Perevalov 
> > Cc: Markus Armbruster 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu 
> > ---
> >  migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c | 23 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c b/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
> > index 367ff6037f..3cf890b887 100644
> > --- a/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
> > +++ b/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
> > @@ -208,15 +208,20 @@ void hmp_info_migrate(Monitor *mon, const QDict 
> > *qdict)
> >  }
> >  
> >  if (info->has_postcopy_vcpu_blocktime) {
> > -Visitor *v;
> > -char *str;
> > -v = string_output_visitor_new(false, &str);
> > -visit_type_uint32List(v, NULL, &info->postcopy_vcpu_blocktime,
> > -  &error_abort);
> > -visit_complete(v, &str);
> > -monitor_printf(mon, "Postcopy vCPU Blocktime: %s\n", str);
> > -g_free(str);
> > -visit_free(v);
> > +uint32List *item = info->postcopy_vcpu_blocktime;
> > +int count = 0;
> > +
> > +monitor_printf(mon, "Postcopy vCPU Blocktime (ms): \n [");
> > +
> > +while (item) {
> > +monitor_printf(mon, "%"PRIu32", ", item->value);
> > +item = item->next;
> > +/* Each line 10 vcpu results, newline if there's more */
> 
> The list can be arbitrarily long?

One per vCPU, so a small arbitrary.

> > +if ((++count % 10 == 0) && item) {
> > +monitor_printf(mon, "\n  ");
> > +}
> > +}
> > +monitor_printf(mon, "\b\b]\n");
> 
> Uh, backspace?

Agreed!

Dave

> I usually do something like
> 
> sep = "";
> for (...) {
> printf("%s...", sep, ...);
> sep = ", "
> }
> 
> To add line breaks, I'd use something like
> 
> sep = ... ? ", " : ",\n";
> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  out:
> 
> The less the string visitors are used, the happier I am.
> 
-- 
 -Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ---   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert|   Running GNU/Linux   | Happy  \ 
\dave @ treblig.org |   | In Hex /
 \ _|_ http://www.treblig.org   |___/



Re: [PATCH 02/11] migration/hmp: Fix postcopy-blocktime per-vCPU results

2025-05-27 Thread Markus Armbruster
Peter Xu  writes:

> Unfortunately, it was never correctly shown..
>
> This is only found when I started to look into making the blocktime feature
> more useful (so as to avoid using bpftrace, even though I'm not sure which
> one will be harder to use..).
>
> So the old dump would look like this:
>
>   Postcopy vCPU Blocktime: 0-1,4,10,21,33,46,48,59
>
> Even though there're actually 40 vcpus, and the string will merge same
> elements and also sort them.
>
> To fix it, simply loop over the uint32List manually.  Now it looks like:
>
>   Postcopy vCPU Blocktime (ms):
>[15, 0, 0, 43, 29, 34, 36, 29, 37, 41,
> 33, 37, 45, 52, 50, 38, 40, 37, 40, 49,
> 40, 35, 35, 35, 81, 19, 18, 19, 18, 30,
> 22, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
>
> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert 
> Cc: Alexey Perevalov 
> Cc: Markus Armbruster 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu 
> ---
>  migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c | 23 ++-
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c b/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
> index 367ff6037f..3cf890b887 100644
> --- a/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
> +++ b/migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c
> @@ -208,15 +208,20 @@ void hmp_info_migrate(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
>  }
>  
>  if (info->has_postcopy_vcpu_blocktime) {
> -Visitor *v;
> -char *str;
> -v = string_output_visitor_new(false, &str);
> -visit_type_uint32List(v, NULL, &info->postcopy_vcpu_blocktime,
> -  &error_abort);
> -visit_complete(v, &str);
> -monitor_printf(mon, "Postcopy vCPU Blocktime: %s\n", str);
> -g_free(str);
> -visit_free(v);
> +uint32List *item = info->postcopy_vcpu_blocktime;
> +int count = 0;
> +
> +monitor_printf(mon, "Postcopy vCPU Blocktime (ms): \n [");
> +
> +while (item) {
> +monitor_printf(mon, "%"PRIu32", ", item->value);
> +item = item->next;
> +/* Each line 10 vcpu results, newline if there's more */

The list can be arbitrarily long?

> +if ((++count % 10 == 0) && item) {
> +monitor_printf(mon, "\n  ");
> +}
> +}
> +monitor_printf(mon, "\b\b]\n");

Uh, backspace?

I usually do something like

sep = "";
for (...) {
printf("%s...", sep, ...);
sep = ", "
}

To add line breaks, I'd use something like

sep = ... ? ", " : ",\n";

>  }
>  
>  out:

The less the string visitors are used, the happier I am.