On 6/30/20 11:03 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a
> pointer to a variable containing NULL.  Passing an argument of the
> latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the
> first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second
> call.
> 
> armsse_realize() is wrong that way: it passes &err to
> object_property_set_int() multiple times without checking it, and then
> to sysbus_realize().  Harmless, because the former can't actually fail
> here.
> 
> Fix by passing &error_abort instead.
> 
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
> Cc: qemu-...@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>

> ---
>  hw/arm/armsse.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/armsse.c b/hw/arm/armsse.c
> index c73cc6badf..e2cf43ee0b 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/armsse.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/armsse.c
> @@ -991,13 +991,13 @@ static void armsse_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>      sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->sysinfo), 0, 0x40020000);
>      /* System control registers */
>      object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->sysctl), info->sys_version,
> -                            "SYS_VERSION", &err);
> +                            "SYS_VERSION", &error_abort);
>      object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->sysctl), info->cpuwait_rst,
> -                            "CPUWAIT_RST", &err);
> +                            "CPUWAIT_RST", &error_abort);
>      object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->sysctl), s->init_svtor,
> -                            "INITSVTOR0_RST", &err);
> +                            "INITSVTOR0_RST", &error_abort);
>      object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->sysctl), s->init_svtor,
> -                            "INITSVTOR1_RST", &err);
> +                            "INITSVTOR1_RST", &error_abort);
>      sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->sysctl), &err);
>      if (err) {
>          error_propagate(errp, err);
> 


Reply via email to