Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] checkpatch: add a warning for basename/dirname

2018-03-02 Thread Julia Suvorova via Qemu-devel


On 02.03.2018 11:56, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/03/2018 09:22, Julia Suvorova wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova 
>> ---
>>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> index 1b4b812..6c4fb42 100755
>> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> @@ -2584,6 +2584,11 @@ sub process {
>>  ERROR("__func__ should be used instead of gcc specific 
>> __FUNCTION__\n"  . $herecurr);
>>  }
>>  
>> +# recommend g_path_get_* over basename(3) and dirname(3)
>> +if ($line =~ /\b(basename|dirname)\s*\(/) {
>> +WARN("consider using g_path_get_$1 in preference to 
>> $1(3)\n" . $herecurr);
>> +}
>> +
>>  # recommend qemu_strto* over strto* for numeric conversions
>>  if ($line =~ /\b(strto[^kd].*?)\s*\(/) {
>>  ERROR("consider using qemu_$1 in preference to $1\n" . 
>> $herecurr);
>>
> 
> Hi Julia, the patch is fine, but given Alex's objections let's warn only
> if you are doing g_strdup(basename(...)) or g_strdup(dirname(...)).
> 

Ok.

> (No other action is needed on your other patch).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Paolo
> 



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] checkpatch: add a warning for basename/dirname

2018-03-02 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 02/03/2018 09:22, Julia Suvorova wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova 
> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 1b4b812..6c4fb42 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2584,6 +2584,11 @@ sub process {
>   ERROR("__func__ should be used instead of gcc specific 
> __FUNCTION__\n"  . $herecurr);
>   }
>  
> +# recommend g_path_get_* over basename(3) and dirname(3)
> + if ($line =~ /\b(basename|dirname)\s*\(/) {
> + WARN("consider using g_path_get_$1 in preference to 
> $1(3)\n" . $herecurr);
> + }
> +
>  # recommend qemu_strto* over strto* for numeric conversions
>   if ($line =~ /\b(strto[^kd].*?)\s*\(/) {
>   ERROR("consider using qemu_$1 in preference to $1\n" . 
> $herecurr);
> 

Hi Julia, the patch is fine, but given Alex's objections let's warn only
if you are doing g_strdup(basename(...)) or g_strdup(dirname(...)).

(No other action is needed on your other patch).

Thanks!

Paolo



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] checkpatch: add a warning for basename/dirname

2018-03-02 Thread no-reply
Hi,

This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:

Type: series
Message-id: 1519978965-16865-1-git-send-email-jus...@mail.ru
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] checkpatch: add a warning for basename/dirname

=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash

BASE=base
n=1
total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l)
failed=0

git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
git config --local diff.renames True
git config --local diff.algorithm histogram

commits="$(git log --format=%H --reverse $BASE..)"
for c in $commits; do
echo "Checking PATCH $n/$total: $(git log -n 1 --format=%s $c)..."
if ! git show $c --format=email | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback -; then
failed=1
echo
fi
n=$((n+1))
done

exit $failed
=== TEST SCRIPT END ===

Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
 * [new tag]   
patchew/1519978965-16865-1-git-send-email-jus...@mail.ru -> 
patchew/1519978965-16865-1-git-send-email-jus...@mail.ru
Switched to a new branch 'test'
d5b85a9adb checkpatch: add a warning for basename/dirname

=== OUTPUT BEGIN ===
Checking PATCH 1/1: checkpatch: add a warning for basename/dirname...
ERROR: line over 90 characters
#19: FILE: scripts/checkpatch.pl:2589:
+   WARN("consider using g_path_get_$1 in preference to 
$1(3)\n" . $herecurr);

total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 11 lines checked

Your patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

=== OUTPUT END ===

Test command exited with code: 1


---
Email generated automatically by Patchew [http://patchew.org/].
Please send your feedback to patchew-de...@freelists.org