On 08/08/18 21:19, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 08/08/18 20:53, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:19:51PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>> For the older machines (such as Mac and SPARC) the DT nodes representing
>>> bootdevices for disk nodes are irregular for mainly histor
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 09:19:31PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 08/08/18 20:53, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:19:51PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> > > For the older machines (such as Mac and SPARC) the DT nodes representing
> > > bootdevices for disk nodes are
On 08/08/18 20:53, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:19:51PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
For the older machines (such as Mac and SPARC) the DT nodes representing
bootdevices for disk nodes are irregular for mainly historical reasons.
Since the majority of bootdevice nodes fo
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 09:39:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 08/08/18 21:19, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> > For the older machines (such as Mac and SPARC) the DT nodes representing
> > bootdevices for disk nodes are irregular for mainly historical reasons.
> >
> > Since the majority of bootdevi
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:19:51PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> For the older machines (such as Mac and SPARC) the DT nodes representing
> bootdevices for disk nodes are irregular for mainly historical reasons.
>
> Since the majority of bootdevice nodes for these machines either do not have a
On 08/08/18 21:19, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> For the older machines (such as Mac and SPARC) the DT nodes representing
> bootdevices for disk nodes are irregular for mainly historical reasons.
>
> Since the majority of bootdevice nodes for these machines either do not have a
> separate disk node or
