Am 30.04.2012 17:52, schrieb Michael Tokarev:
This value is used currently for virtio-blk only. It was defined
as uint16_t before, which is the same as in kernel=user interface
(in virtio_blk.h, struct virtio_blk_config). But the problem is
that in kernel=user interface the units are sectors
02.05.2012 13:57, Kevin Wolf пишет:
Am 30.04.2012 17:52, schrieb Michael Tokarev:
This value is used currently for virtio-blk only. It was defined
as uint16_t before, which is the same as in kernel=user interface
(in virtio_blk.h, struct virtio_blk_config). But the problem is
that in
Am 02.05.2012 12:08, schrieb Michael Tokarev:
02.05.2012 13:57, Kevin Wolf пишет:
Am 30.04.2012 17:52, schrieb Michael Tokarev:
This value is used currently for virtio-blk only. It was defined
as uint16_t before, which is the same as in kernel=user interface
(in virtio_blk.h, struct
On 02.05.2012 18:35, Kevin Wolf wrote:
[]
As I already mentioned, the virtio protocol has the same defect (but there
it is less serious due to usage of larger units). And that's where the
additional overflow needs to be ELIMINATED, not just checked. Ie, the
protocol should be changed somehow
Am 02.05.2012 17:37, schrieb Michael Tokarev:
On 02.05.2012 18:35, Kevin Wolf wrote:
[]
As I already mentioned, the virtio protocol has the same defect (but there
it is less serious due to usage of larger units). And that's where the
additional overflow needs to be ELIMINATED, not just
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
This value is used currently for virtio-blk only. It was defined
as uint16_t before, which is the same as in kernel=user interface
(in virtio_blk.h, struct virtio_blk_config). But the problem is
that in kernel=user
On 01.05.2012 12:27, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
This value is used currently for virtio-blk only. It was defined
as uint16_t before, which is the same as in kernel=user interface
(in virtio_blk.h, struct virtio_blk_config).
