On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:37 PM, 858585 jemmy wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:58 AM, 858585 jemmy wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 20.04.2017 um 10:38 hat jemmy858...@gmail.com geschrieben:
From: Lidong Chen
when the buffer is zero, blk_co_p
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:58 AM, 858585 jemmy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 20.04.2017 um 10:38 hat jemmy858...@gmail.com geschrieben:
>>> From: Lidong Chen
>>>
>>> when the buffer is zero, blk_co_pwrite_zeroes is more effectively than
>>> blk_co_pwritev with
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 20.04.2017 um 10:38 hat jemmy858...@gmail.com geschrieben:
>> From: Lidong Chen
>>
>> when the buffer is zero, blk_co_pwrite_zeroes is more effectively than
>> blk_co_pwritev with BDRV_REQ_WRITE_COMPRESSED. this patch can reduces
>> the time
Am 20.04.2017 um 10:38 hat jemmy858...@gmail.com geschrieben:
> From: Lidong Chen
>
> when the buffer is zero, blk_co_pwrite_zeroes is more effectively than
> blk_co_pwritev with BDRV_REQ_WRITE_COMPRESSED. this patch can reduces
> the time when converts the qcow2 image with lots of zero.
>
> Sig
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
> From: Lidong Chen
>
> when the buffer is zero, blk_co_pwrite_zeroes is more effectively than
> blk_co_pwritev with BDRV_REQ_WRITE_COMPRESSED. this patch can reduces
> the time when converts the qcow2 image with lots of zero.
>
the original qcow2 file wh