On 10/26/2016 12:52 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:32:55PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
On 10/13/2016 06:56 PM, John Snow wrote:
This is a follow-up to patches 1-6 of:
[PATCH v2 00/11] blockjobs: Fix transactional race condition
That series started trying to refactor blockjobs
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 02:32:55PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/2016 06:56 PM, John Snow wrote:
> >This is a follow-up to patches 1-6 of:
> >[PATCH v2 00/11] blockjobs: Fix transactional race condition
> >
> >That series started trying to refactor blockjobs with the goal of
>
On 10/13/2016 06:56 PM, John Snow wrote:
This is a follow-up to patches 1-6 of:
[PATCH v2 00/11] blockjobs: Fix transactional race condition
That series started trying to refactor blockjobs with the goal of
internalizing BlockJob state as a side effect of having gone through
the effort of
Hi,
Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 1476399422-8028-1-git-send-email-js...@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] blockjobs: preliminary refactoring work, Pt 1
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
