On 05/01/2012 05:12 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 02/05/2012 00:01, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
There's magic in the qdev layer now to decide whether a Property in the
array of properties becomes a legacy or static property (it's only ever
exposed as one type).
I don't think this is true: a leg
Il 02/05/2012 00:01, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>
> There's magic in the qdev layer now to decide whether a Property in the
> array of properties becomes a legacy or static property (it's only ever
> exposed as one type).
I don't think this is true: a legacy property always has a static
counterp
On 05/01/2012 03:57 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 1 May 2012 21:48, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Legacy properties != static properties.
qdev_add_properties adds both legacy and static properties. I'm happy to
put static properties into object but not legacy properties.
So, er, how are you defining
Am 01.05.2012 22:37, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 05/01/2012 02:05 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 01.05.2012 20:18, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> This allows a base class to easily add properties.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
>>
>> Implementation looks okay but /me not so happy with it:
On 1 May 2012 21:48, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Legacy properties != static properties.
>
> qdev_add_properties adds both legacy and static properties. I'm happy to
> put static properties into object but not legacy properties.
So, er, how are you defining legacy and static properties?
I would hav
On 05/01/2012 03:43 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 01.05.2012 22:37, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 05/01/2012 02:05 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 01.05.2012 20:18, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
This allows a base class to easily add properties.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
Implementation looks okay
On 05/01/2012 02:05 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 01.05.2012 20:18, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
This allows a base class to easily add properties.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
Implementation looks okay but /me not so happy with it: This conflicts
with the move of the qdev static property infras
Am 01.05.2012 20:18, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> This allows a base class to easily add properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
Implementation looks okay but /me not so happy with it: This conflicts
with the move of the qdev static property infrastructure from
DeviceState to Object.
Consi
