On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:49:31AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 10:43, David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:14:59PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> On 14.03.2016 17:56, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >>>
> >>>
On 15.03.2016 10:43, David Gibson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:14:59PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 14.03.2016 17:56, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>>>
>>> We don't give them a KVM reg number to most of the registers yet as no
>>>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:14:59PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 14.03.2016 17:56, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >
> > We don't give them a KVM reg number to most of the registers yet as no
> > current KVM version supports HV mode. For
On 14.03.2016 17:56, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>
> We don't give them a KVM reg number to most of the registers yet as no
> current KVM version supports HV mode. For DAWR and DAWRX, the KVM reg
> number is needed since this register can be