On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:18:33 +0200
Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 09.08.2017 11:05, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:59:37 +0200
> > Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> @@ -80,16 +81,26 @@ int boot_sector_init(char *fname)
> >> return 1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -/* For Open Firmware bas
On 09.08.2017 11:05, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:59:37 +0200
> Thomas Huth wrote:
>
>> Re-using the boot_sector code buffer from x86 for other architectures
>> is not very nice, especially if we add more architectures later. It's
>> also ugly that the test uses a huge pre-initia
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:59:37 +0200
Thomas Huth wrote:
> Re-using the boot_sector code buffer from x86 for other architectures
> is not very nice, especially if we add more architectures later. It's
> also ugly that the test uses a huge pre-initialized array - the size
> of the executable is very
