Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vfio-pci: Use vfio_register_event_notifier in vfio_intx_enable_kvm

2019-01-16 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy



On 12/01/2019 03:58, Eric Auger wrote:
> We can also use vfio_register_event_notifier() helper in
> vfio_intx_enable_kvm to set the signalling associated to
> VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger 
> ---
>  hw/vfio/pci.c | 38 +++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index c589a4e666..db0504ca10 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,9 @@ static int vfio_register_event_notifier(VFIOPCIDevice 
> *vdev,
>  case VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX:
>  notifier = >err_notifier;
>  break;
> +case VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX:
> +notifier = >intx.interrupt;
> +break;
>  default:
>  return -EINVAL;
>  }
> @@ -351,10 +354,8 @@ static void vfio_intx_update(PCIDevice *pdev)
>  static int vfio_intx_enable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
>  {
>  uint8_t pin = vfio_pci_read_config(>pdev, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, 1);
> -int ret, argsz, retval = 0;
> -struct vfio_irq_set *irq_set;
> -int32_t *pfd;
>  Error *err = NULL;
> +int ret;
>  
>  if (!pin) {
>  return 0;
> @@ -376,34 +377,12 @@ static int vfio_intx_enable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error 
> **errp)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -ret = event_notifier_init(>intx.interrupt, 0);
> +ret = vfio_register_event_notifier(vdev, VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX, true,
> +   vfio_intx_interrupt, errp);
>  if (ret) {
> -error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "event_notifier_init failed");
>  return ret;
>  }
>  
> -argsz = sizeof(*irq_set) + sizeof(*pfd);
> -
> -irq_set = g_malloc0(argsz);
> -irq_set->argsz = argsz;
> -irq_set->flags = VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD | VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER;
> -irq_set->index = VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX;
> -irq_set->start = 0;
> -irq_set->count = 1;
> -pfd = (int32_t *)_set->data;
> -
> -*pfd = event_notifier_get_fd(>intx.interrupt);
> -qemu_set_fd_handler(*pfd, vfio_intx_interrupt, NULL, vdev);
> -
> -ret = ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS, irq_set);
> -if (ret) {
> -error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "failed to setup INTx fd");
> -qemu_set_fd_handler(*pfd, NULL, NULL, vdev);
> -event_notifier_cleanup(>intx.interrupt);


After this change if ioctl(VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS) failed, there will be
no event_notifier_cleanup() called as this new
vfio_register_event_notifier() does not do this either.


> -retval = -errno;
> -goto cleanup;
> -}
> -
>  vfio_intx_enable_kvm(vdev, );
>  if (err) {
>  warn_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vdev->vbasedev.name);
> @@ -413,10 +392,7 @@ static int vfio_intx_enable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error 
> **errp)
>  
>  trace_vfio_intx_enable(vdev->vbasedev.name);
>  
> -cleanup:
> -g_free(irq_set);
> -
> -return retval;
> +return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void vfio_intx_disable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> 

-- 
Alexey



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vfio-pci: Use vfio_register_event_notifier in vfio_intx_enable_kvm

2019-01-15 Thread Auger Eric
Hi Cornelia,

On 1/15/19 1:12 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:58:01 +0100
> Eric Auger  wrote:
> 
>> We can also use vfio_register_event_notifier() helper in
>> vfio_intx_enable_kvm to set the signalling associated to
>> VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger 
>> ---
>>  hw/vfio/pci.c | 38 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
> 
>>  static void vfio_intx_disable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> 
> I'm wondering why the _disable path can't use the new helper. Ordering
> issues?
> 
Yes the interleaving of actions scared me a little bit. I am going to
study this a little bit further ...

Thanks

Eric



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vfio-pci: Use vfio_register_event_notifier in vfio_intx_enable_kvm

2019-01-15 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:58:01 +0100
Eric Auger  wrote:

> We can also use vfio_register_event_notifier() helper in
> vfio_intx_enable_kvm to set the signalling associated to
> VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger 
> ---
>  hw/vfio/pci.c | 38 +++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 

>  static void vfio_intx_disable(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)

I'm wondering why the _disable path can't use the new helper. Ordering
issues?