On 04/05/2018 05:07 PM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> IPL over a virtio-scsi device requires special handling not
> available in the real architecture. For this purpose the IPL
> type 0xFF has been chosen as means of communication between
> QEMU and the pc-bios. However, a guest OS could be
On 06.04.2018 11:28, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 05.04.2018 17:07, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
>> IPL over a virtio-scsi device requires special handling not
>> available in the real architecture. For this purpose the IPL
>> type 0xFF has been chosen as means of communication between
>> QEMU and the
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:28:31 +0200
Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 05.04.2018 17:07, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> > IPL over a virtio-scsi device requires special handling not
> > available in the real architecture. For this purpose the IPL
> > type 0xFF has been chosen as means of
On 05.04.2018 17:07, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> IPL over a virtio-scsi device requires special handling not
> available in the real architecture. For this purpose the IPL
> type 0xFF has been chosen as means of communication between
> QEMU and the pc-bios. However, a guest OS could be confused
>
On 05.04.2018 17:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 05.04.2018 17:07, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
>> IPL over a virtio-scsi device requires special handling not
>> available in the real architecture. For this purpose the IPL
>> type 0xFF has been chosen as means of communication between
>> QEMU and
On 05.04.2018 17:07, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> IPL over a virtio-scsi device requires special handling not
> available in the real architecture. For this purpose the IPL
> type 0xFF has been chosen as means of communication between
> QEMU and the pc-bios. However, a guest OS could be confused
>