On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:08:42 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 03:56 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> >> So, what are you proposing? Being more specific and stating that the
> >> scsw is not necessarily a real scsw, but merely a vehicle for sending a
> >> command? Or keeping it as it is now for s
On 06/12/2018 03:56 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
So, what are you proposing? Being more specific and stating that the
scsw is not necessarily a real scsw, but merely a vehicle for sending a
command? Or keeping it as it is now for ssch, and adding a second
interface for hsch/csch (and maybe rsch, msc
On 12/06/2018 11:59, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 17:51:27 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 08/06/2018 16:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:13:28 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 06/08/2018 02:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
My proposal is to do the same
copying to scsw(r) ag
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 17:51:27 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 08/06/2018 16:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:13:28 +0200
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/08/2018 02:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > My proposal is to do the same
> > copying to scsw(r) again, which w
On 06/08/2018 04:45 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:13:28 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 06/08/2018 02:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
My proposal is to do the same
copying to scsw(r) again, which would mean we get a request with both
the halt and the start bit set. The vfio code n
On 08/06/2018 16:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:13:28 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 06/08/2018 02:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
My proposal is to do the same
copying to scsw(r) again, which would mean we get a request with both
the halt and the start bit set. The vfio code now nee
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 15:13:28 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 06/08/2018 02:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> My proposal is to do the same
> >>> copying to scsw(r) again, which would mean we get a request with both
> >>> the halt and the start bit set. The vfio code now needs to do a hsch
> >>> (ins
On 06/08/2018 02:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
My proposal is to do the same
copying to scsw(r) again, which would mean we get a request with both
the halt and the start bit set. The vfio code now needs to do a hsch
(instead of a ssch). The real channel subsystem should figure this out,
as we ca
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 18:37:16 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 07/06/2018 11:54, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > --
> > | scsw(g) | ssch
> > -- |
> > | guest
> > ---
On 07/06/2018 11:54, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 16:15:31 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 06/06/2018 14:21, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 17:23:02 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 05/06/2018 15:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2018 17:10:44 +0200
Pierre Morel wrot
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 16:15:31 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 06/06/2018 14:21, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 17:23:02 +0200
> > Pierre Morel wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/06/2018 15:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 22 May 2018 17:10:44 +0200
> >>> Pierre Morel wrote:
> >>>
>
On 06/06/2018 14:21, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 17:23:02 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 05/06/2018 15:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2018 17:10:44 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/05/2018 14:52, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2018 15:32:48 +0200
Pierre Morel wro
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 17:23:02 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 05/06/2018 15:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2018 17:10:44 +0200
> > Pierre Morel wrote:
> >
> >> On 22/05/2018 14:52, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 15:32:48 +0200
> >>> Pierre Morel wrote:
> >>>
>
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 17:23:02 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> May be I should try to integrate your patches so we have a better view.
Not sure whether it is worth trying to do so in the current state.
(Also, I really need to get the information into my personal cache
again, before I write too many w
On 05/06/2018 15:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2018 17:10:44 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/05/2018 14:52, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2018 15:32:48 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 15/05/2018 18:10, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2018 11:33:35 +0200
Pierre Morel wr
On Tue, 22 May 2018 17:10:44 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 22/05/2018 14:52, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 May 2018 15:32:48 +0200
> > Pierre Morel wrote:
> >
> >> On 15/05/2018 18:10, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 11 May 2018 11:33:35 +0200
> >>> Pierre Morel wrote:
> >>>
On 22/05/2018 14:52, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2018 15:32:48 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 15/05/2018 18:10, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2018 11:33:35 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 09/05/2018 17:48, Cornelia Huck wrote:
@@ -126,7 +192,24 @@ static void fsm_io_request(str
On Wed, 16 May 2018 15:32:48 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 15/05/2018 18:10, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 May 2018 11:33:35 +0200
> > Pierre Morel wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/05/2018 17:48, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> @@ -126,7 +192,24 @@ static void fsm_io_request(struct vfio_ccw_private
On 15/05/2018 18:10, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2018 11:33:35 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
On 09/05/2018 17:48, Cornelia Huck wrote:
Currently, vfio-ccw only relays start subchannel requests to the real
hardware, which is enough in many cases but falls short e.g. during
error recovery.
On Fri, 11 May 2018 11:33:35 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 09/05/2018 17:48, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > Currently, vfio-ccw only relays start subchannel requests to the real
> > hardware, which is enough in many cases but falls short e.g. during
> > error recovery.
> >
> > Fortunately, it is easy
On 09/05/2018 17:48, Cornelia Huck wrote:
Currently, vfio-ccw only relays start subchannel requests to the real
hardware, which is enough in many cases but falls short e.g. during
error recovery.
Fortunately, it is easy to add support for halt and clear subchannel
requests to the existing infras
21 matches
Mail list logo
