* Wei Huang (w...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>
> On 02/27/2018 05:38 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Wei Huang (w...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/26/2018 12:01 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >>> * Wei Huang (w...@redhat.com) wrote:
> The x86 boot block header currently is
On 02/27/2018 05:38 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Wei Huang (w...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/26/2018 12:01 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>>> * Wei Huang (w...@redhat.com) wrote:
The x86 boot block header currently is generated with a shell script.
To better support
* Wei Huang (w...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>
> On 02/26/2018 12:01 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Wei Huang (w...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> The x86 boot block header currently is generated with a shell script.
> >> To better support other CPUs (e.g. aarch64), we convert the script
> >> into
On 02/26/2018 12:01 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Wei Huang (w...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> The x86 boot block header currently is generated with a shell script.
>> To better support other CPUs (e.g. aarch64), we convert the script
>> into Makefile. This allows us to 1) support
* Wei Huang (w...@redhat.com) wrote:
> The x86 boot block header currently is generated with a shell script.
> To better support other CPUs (e.g. aarch64), we convert the script
> into Makefile. This allows us to 1) support cross-compilation easily,
> and 2) avoid creating a script file for every
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 03:58:56PM -0600, Wei Huang wrote:
> The x86 boot block header currently is generated with a shell script.
> To better support other CPUs (e.g. aarch64), we convert the script
> into Makefile. This allows us to 1) support cross-compilation easily,
> and 2) avoid creating a