Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: Support f_flags in statfs when available.

2018-02-22 Thread no-reply
Hi, This series failed build test on s390x host. Please find the details below. Type: series Message-id: 20180219024555.26467-1-s...@shealevy.com Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: Support f_flags in statfs when available. === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash # Testing script will be

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: Support f_flags in statfs when available.

2018-02-22 Thread Fam Zheng
On Thu, 02/22 10:18, Shea Levy wrote: > Hello, > > These tabs match the existing style of linux-user/syscall.h, should I > remove them? > In practice, following the style of the surrounding code is usually preferred, and we ignore these errors in such cases. Fam

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: Support f_flags in statfs when available.

2018-02-22 Thread no-reply
Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20180219024555.26467-1-s...@shealevy.com Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: Support f_flags in statfs when available. === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash BASE=b

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: Support f_flags in statfs when available.

2018-02-22 Thread Shea Levy
Hello, These tabs match the existing style of linux-user/syscall.h, should I remove them? Also, there doesn't appear to be a maintainer for checkpatch in the current MAINTAINERS file, whom should I CC on this? Thanks, Shea no-re...@patchew.org writes: > Hi, > > This series seems to have some c