On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:16:55 -0500
Collin Walling wrote:
> The extended PTFF features (qsie, qtoue, stoe, stoue) are dependent
> on the multiple-epoch facility (mepoch). Let's print a warning if these
> features are enabled without mepoch.
>
> While we're at it, let's move the FEAT_GROUP_INIT
On 12.02.19 02:16, Collin Walling wrote:
> The extended PTFF features (qsie, qtoue, stoe, stoue) are dependent
> on the multiple-epoch facility (mepoch). Let's print a warning if these
> features are enabled without mepoch.
>
> While we're at it, let's move the FEAT_GROUP_INIT for mepochptff down
On 2/12/19 5:09 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 12.02.2019 02:16, Collin Walling wrote:
>> The extended PTFF features (qsie, qtoue, stoe, stoue) are dependent
>> on the multiple-epoch facility (mepoch). Let's print a warning if these
>> features are enabled without mepoch.
>>
>> While
On 12.02.2019 02:16, Collin Walling wrote:
> The extended PTFF features (qsie, qtoue, stoe, stoue) are dependent
> on the multiple-epoch facility (mepoch). Let's print a warning if these
> features are enabled without mepoch.
>
> While we're at it, let's move the FEAT_GROUP_INIT for mepochptff
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:16:55 -0500
Collin Walling wrote:
> The extended PTFF features (qsie, qtoue, stoe, stoue) are dependent
> on the multiple-epoch facility (mepoch). Let's print a warning if these
> features are enabled without mepoch.
>
> While we're at it, let's move the FEAT_GROUP_INIT
