On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:56:59AM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 11:20:50AM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 03:31:48PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> > >
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 11:20:50AM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 03:31:48PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
It's not clear to me why this is preferable to
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 11:20:50AM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 03:31:48PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
> >
> > It's not clear to me why this is preferable to having the registers
> >
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 03:31:48PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
It's not clear to me why this is preferable to having the registers
embedded in the state structure. The latter is pretty standard
practice for qemu.
Maybe
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 03:31:48PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
It's not clear to me why this is preferable to having the registers
embedded in the state structure. The latter is pretty standard
practice for qemu.
> ---
> hw/i2c/ppc4xx_i2c.c | 75
>