Anton Nefedov writes:
> On 14/6/2018 10:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Anton Nefedov writes:
>>
>>> It often happens that just a few discriminator values imply extra data in
>>> a flat union. Existing checks did not make possible to leave other values
>>> uncovered. Such cases had to be
On 14/6/2018 10:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anton Nefedov writes:
It often happens that just a few discriminator values imply extra data in
a flat union. Existing checks did not make possible to leave other values
uncovered. Such cases had to be worked around by either stating a dummy
Anton Nefedov writes:
> It often happens that just a few discriminator values imply extra data in
> a flat union. Existing checks did not make possible to leave other values
> uncovered. Such cases had to be worked around by either stating a dummy
> (empty) type or introducing another (subset)
