On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> [...]
> > > > @@ -125,10 +127,19 @@ static ssize_t xen_9pfs_pdu_vmarshal(V9fsPDU *pdu,
> > > > Xen9pfsDev *xen_9pfs = container_of(pdu->s, Xen9pfsDev,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
[...]
> > > @@ -125,10 +127,19 @@ static ssize_t xen_9pfs_pdu_vmarshal(V9fsPDU *pdu,
> > > Xen9pfsDev *xen_9pfs = container_of(pdu->s, Xen9pfsDev, state);
> > > struct iovec in_sg[2];
> > >
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
> > > Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
> > Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > > The
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > The 9P protocol is transport agnostic: if the guest misconfigured the
> > > buffers, the best we can do is to set
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > The 9P protocol is transport agnostic: if the guest misconfigured the
> > buffers, the best we can do is to set the broken flag on the device.
> >
> > Since
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Greg Kurz wrote:
> The 9P protocol is transport agnostic: if the guest misconfigured the
> buffers, the best we can do is to set the broken flag on the device.
>
> Since virtio_pdu_vmarshal() may be called by several active PDUs, we
> check if the transport isn't broken