On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:28:10 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Emilio G. Cota writes:
> > I have not tested the ARM bits. I just tested aarch64 and it works, though.
> >
> > I put the scripts online so that others can easily generate natively the
> > ck_pr
> > tests. If you have an architecture I d
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:17:35 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Emilio G. Cota writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 14:40:26 -0500, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> Sixth time is the charm, right? This time I'm certain that it
> >> compiles with centos6, and contains the previously missing update
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 10/17/2016 01:17 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Emilio G. Cota writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 14:40:26 -0500, Richard Henderson wrote:
Sixth time is the charm, right? This time I'm certain that it
compiles with centos6, and contains the previously
On 10/17/2016 01:17 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
Emilio G. Cota writes:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 14:40:26 -0500, Richard Henderson wrote:
Sixth time is the charm, right? This time I'm certain that it
compiles with centos6, and contains the previously missing update
from Emilio to atomic_add-bench.
Emilio G. Cota writes:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 14:40:26 -0500, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Sixth time is the charm, right? This time I'm certain that it
>> compiles with centos6, and contains the previously missing update
>> from Emilio to atomic_add-bench.
>
> For patches 03-16 (including th
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 14:40:26 -0500, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Sixth time is the charm, right? This time I'm certain that it
> compiles with centos6, and contains the previously missing update
> from Emilio to atomic_add-bench.
For patches 03-16 (including the elusive patch 06 for which I rev
