Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 2/2] qga: update guest-suspend-ram and guest-suspend-hybrid descriptions
Daniel Henrique Barboza writes: > On 05/15/2018 12:35 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Daniel Henrique Barboza writes: >> >>> This patch updates the descriptions of 'guest-suspend-ram' and >>> 'guest-suspend-hybrid' to mention that both commands relies now >>> on the existence of 'system_wakeup' and also on the proper support >>> for wake up from suspend, retrieved by the 'wakeup-suspend-support' >>> attribute of the 'query-target' QMP command. >>> >>> Reported-by: Balamuruhan S >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza >>> Reviewed-by: Michael Roth >>> --- >>> qga/qapi-schema.json | 14 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/qga/qapi-schema.json b/qga/qapi-schema.json >>> index 17884c7c70..e3fb8adfce 100644 >>> --- a/qga/qapi-schema.json >>> +++ b/qga/qapi-schema.json >>> @@ -566,8 +566,11 @@ >>> # package installed in the guest. >>> # >>> # IMPORTANT: guest-suspend-ram requires QEMU to support the >>> 'system_wakeup' >>> -# command. Thus, it's *required* to query QEMU for the presence of the >>> -# 'system_wakeup' command before issuing guest-suspend-ram. >>> +# command and the guest to support wake up from suspend. Thus, it's >>> +# *required* to query QEMU for the presence of the 'system_wakeup' command >>> +# and to verify that wake up from suspend is enabled by checking the >>> +# 'wakeup-suspend-support' flag of 'query-target' QMP command, before >>> issuing >>> +# guest-suspend-ram. >> Isn't checking for presence of system_wakeup redundant? >> >> When query-target tells us "system_wakeup works" by returning >> wakeup-suspend-support: true, we surely have system_wakeup (or else >> query-target would be lying to us). >> >> When it returns wakeup-suspend-support: false, it doesn't matter whether >> we have system_wakeup. >> >> Unless I'm wrong, we can simplify this to something like >> >> # IMPORTANT: guest-suspend-ram requires working wakeup support in >> # QEMU. You *must* check QMP command query-target returns >> # wakeup-suspend-support: true before issuing this command. > > It is worth noticing that this API isn't checking for the existence of > system_wakeup. It is checking whether there are notifiers added in > the wakeup_notifiers QLIST. > > However, I think we can simplify the text as you suggested because that > part seems outdated anyway. Is there any relevant scenario where > system_wakeup will not be present? I doubt it: we have system_wakeup since 1.1, and we've even backported it to RHEL-6. But even if there *was* a relevant scenario involving a QEMU that doesn't provide system_wakeup, that QEMU will also not provide member wakeup-suspend-support, let alone tell us wakeup-suspend-support: true, unless somebody set out to break things on purpose. That somebody would get to keep the pieces then.
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 2/2] qga: update guest-suspend-ram and guest-suspend-hybrid descriptions
On 05/15/2018 12:35 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: Daniel Henrique Barboza writes: This patch updates the descriptions of 'guest-suspend-ram' and 'guest-suspend-hybrid' to mention that both commands relies now on the existence of 'system_wakeup' and also on the proper support for wake up from suspend, retrieved by the 'wakeup-suspend-support' attribute of the 'query-target' QMP command. Reported-by: Balamuruhan S Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza Reviewed-by: Michael Roth --- qga/qapi-schema.json | 14 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/qga/qapi-schema.json b/qga/qapi-schema.json index 17884c7c70..e3fb8adfce 100644 --- a/qga/qapi-schema.json +++ b/qga/qapi-schema.json @@ -566,8 +566,11 @@ # package installed in the guest. # # IMPORTANT: guest-suspend-ram requires QEMU to support the 'system_wakeup' -# command. Thus, it's *required* to query QEMU for the presence of the -# 'system_wakeup' command before issuing guest-suspend-ram. +# command and the guest to support wake up from suspend. Thus, it's +# *required* to query QEMU for the presence of the 'system_wakeup' command +# and to verify that wake up from suspend is enabled by checking the +# 'wakeup-suspend-support' flag of 'query-target' QMP command, before issuing +# guest-suspend-ram. Isn't checking for presence of system_wakeup redundant? When query-target tells us "system_wakeup works" by returning wakeup-suspend-support: true, we surely have system_wakeup (or else query-target would be lying to us). When it returns wakeup-suspend-support: false, it doesn't matter whether we have system_wakeup. Unless I'm wrong, we can simplify this to something like # IMPORTANT: guest-suspend-ram requires working wakeup support in # QEMU. You *must* check QMP command query-target returns # wakeup-suspend-support: true before issuing this command. It is worth noticing that this API isn't checking for the existence of system_wakeup. It is checking whether there are notifiers added in the wakeup_notifiers QLIST. However, I think we can simplify the text as you suggested because that part seems outdated anyway. Is there any relevant scenario where system_wakeup will not be present? # # This command does NOT return a response on success. There are two options # to check for success: @@ -593,8 +596,11 @@ # This command requires the pm-utils package to be installed in the guest. # # IMPORTANT: guest-suspend-hybrid requires QEMU to support the 'system_wakeup' -# command. Thus, it's *required* to query QEMU for the presence of the -# 'system_wakeup' command before issuing guest-suspend-hybrid. +# command and the guest to support wake up from suspend. Thus, it's +# *required* to query QEMU for the presence of the 'system_wakeup' command +# and to verify that wake up from suspend is enabled by checking the +# 'wakeup-suspend-support' flag of 'query-target' QMP command, before issuing +# guest-suspend-hybrid. # # This command does NOT return a response on success. There are two options # to check for success: Likewise.
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 2/2] qga: update guest-suspend-ram and guest-suspend-hybrid descriptions
Daniel Henrique Barboza writes: > This patch updates the descriptions of 'guest-suspend-ram' and > 'guest-suspend-hybrid' to mention that both commands relies now > on the existence of 'system_wakeup' and also on the proper support > for wake up from suspend, retrieved by the 'wakeup-suspend-support' > attribute of the 'query-target' QMP command. > > Reported-by: Balamuruhan S > Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza > Reviewed-by: Michael Roth > --- > qga/qapi-schema.json | 14 ++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/qga/qapi-schema.json b/qga/qapi-schema.json > index 17884c7c70..e3fb8adfce 100644 > --- a/qga/qapi-schema.json > +++ b/qga/qapi-schema.json > @@ -566,8 +566,11 @@ > # package installed in the guest. > # > # IMPORTANT: guest-suspend-ram requires QEMU to support the 'system_wakeup' > -# command. Thus, it's *required* to query QEMU for the presence of the > -# 'system_wakeup' command before issuing guest-suspend-ram. > +# command and the guest to support wake up from suspend. Thus, it's > +# *required* to query QEMU for the presence of the 'system_wakeup' command > +# and to verify that wake up from suspend is enabled by checking the > +# 'wakeup-suspend-support' flag of 'query-target' QMP command, before issuing > +# guest-suspend-ram. Isn't checking for presence of system_wakeup redundant? When query-target tells us "system_wakeup works" by returning wakeup-suspend-support: true, we surely have system_wakeup (or else query-target would be lying to us). When it returns wakeup-suspend-support: false, it doesn't matter whether we have system_wakeup. Unless I'm wrong, we can simplify this to something like # IMPORTANT: guest-suspend-ram requires working wakeup support in # QEMU. You *must* check QMP command query-target returns # wakeup-suspend-support: true before issuing this command. > # > # This command does NOT return a response on success. There are two options > # to check for success: > @@ -593,8 +596,11 @@ > # This command requires the pm-utils package to be installed in the guest. > # > # IMPORTANT: guest-suspend-hybrid requires QEMU to support the > 'system_wakeup' > -# command. Thus, it's *required* to query QEMU for the presence of the > -# 'system_wakeup' command before issuing guest-suspend-hybrid. > +# command and the guest to support wake up from suspend. Thus, it's > +# *required* to query QEMU for the presence of the 'system_wakeup' command > +# and to verify that wake up from suspend is enabled by checking the > +# 'wakeup-suspend-support' flag of 'query-target' QMP command, before issuing > +# guest-suspend-hybrid. > # > # This command does NOT return a response on success. There are two options > # to check for success: Likewise.
