On 11/30/2017 10:50 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:51:23 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> On 11/28/2017 03:45 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:49 +0100
>>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:51:23 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 03:45 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:49 +0100
> > Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/28/2017 03:01 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>>
On 11/28/2017 03:45 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:49 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> On 11/28/2017 03:01 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:25:08 +0100
>>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:49 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 03:01 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:25:08 +0100
> > Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >> What I want now is to enable vfio-ccw for libvirt and
On 11/28/2017 03:01 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:25:08 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> On 11/28/2017 02:17 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>>> In the meanwhile I strongly prefer option 1 (at the ccw devices). I've just
>>> sent a v2, and IMHO it
On 11/24/2017 01:46 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:33:56 +0100
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> Having an adequate representation for the css in QOM would be certainly
>> interesting, but at the same time (IMHO) is somewhat challenging. Let me
>> make some
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:25:08 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 02:17 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > In the meanwhile I strongly prefer option 1 (at the ccw devices). I've just
> > sent a v2, and IMHO it shows the limitations of machine properties very
> >
On 11/28/2017 02:17 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 11/28/2017 01:24 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/28/2017 01:14 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:49:04 +0100
>>> Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
>>>
On 11/28/2017 11:22 AM, Cornelia
On 11/28/2017 01:24 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 11/28/2017 01:14 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:49:04 +0100
>> Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/28/2017 11:22 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:53:15 +0100
On 11/28/2017 01:14 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:49:04 +0100
> Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
>
>> On 11/28/2017 11:22 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:53:15 +0100
>>> Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
>>>
On
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:49:04 +0100
Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 11:22 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:53:15 +0100
> > Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/27/2017 05:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>>
On 11/28/2017 11:22 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:53:15 +0100
Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
On 11/27/2017 05:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
Proposal 2: Export the default cssid as a machine property. If this
property exists, it also implies that devices
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:53:15 +0100
Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 05:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > Proposal 2: Export the default cssid as a machine property. If this
> > property exists, it also implies that devices can be put into any css
> > image
On 11/27/2017 05:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
Proposal 2: Export the default cssid as a machine property. If this
property exists, it also implies that devices can be put into any css
image (although it makes the most sense to put them into the default
css image as indicated by the property). Can
* Cornelia Huck [2017-11-27 13:58:16 +0100]:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:20:56 +0800
> Dong Jia Shi wrote:
>
> > * Halil Pasic [2017-11-24 17:39:04 +0100]:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/24/2017 05:15 PM, Cornelia Huck
* Cornelia Huck [2017-11-27 17:56:07 +0100]:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:09:09 +0100
> Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
>
> > On 11/27/2017 03:13 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/27/2017 02:19 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 27 Nov
On 11/27/2017 05:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:09:09 +0100
> Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
>
>> On 11/27/2017 03:13 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/27/2017 02:19 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:11:57 +0100
Halil
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:09:09 +0100
Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 03:13 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/27/2017 02:19 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:11:57 +0100
> >> Halil Pasic wrote:
> >>
> >>>
On 11/27/2017 03:13 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 11/27/2017 02:19 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:11:57 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 11/27/2017 01:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:39:04 +0100
Halil Pasic
On 11/27/2017 03:03 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 11/27/2017 02:19 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:11:57 +0100
>> Halil Pasic wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/27/2017 01:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:39:04 +0100
Halil
On 11/27/2017 02:19 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:11:57 +0100
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> On 11/27/2017 01:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:39:04 +0100
>>> Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
On 11/24/2017
On 11/27/2017 02:19 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:11:57 +0100
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> On 11/27/2017 01:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:39:04 +0100
>>> Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
On 11/24/2017
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:11:57 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 01:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:39:04 +0100
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/24/2017 05:15 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> (Unless we
On 11/27/2017 01:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:39:04 +0100
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> On 11/24/2017 05:15 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> In theory this should work.
>
> In reality it seems more complicated. A per-device property is easy
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:20:56 +0800
Dong Jia Shi wrote:
> * Halil Pasic [2017-11-24 17:39:04 +0100]:
>
> >
> >
> > On 11/24/2017 05:15 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > >>> In theory this should work.
> > >>>
> > >>> In reality it seems
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:39:04 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 11/24/2017 05:15 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> In theory this should work.
> >>>
> >>> In reality it seems more complicated. A per-device property is easy and
> >>> can be
> >>> inspected on the command line
* Halil Pasic [2017-11-24 17:39:04 +0100]:
>
>
> On 11/24/2017 05:15 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> In theory this should work.
> >>>
> >>> In reality it seems more complicated. A per-device property is easy and
> >>> can be
> >>> inspected on the command line (e.g.
On 11/24/2017 05:15 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> In theory this should work.
>>>
>>> In reality it seems more complicated. A per-device property is easy and can
>>> be
>>> inspected on the command line (e.g. -device virtio-blk-ccw,help), while a
>>> new
>>> machine property would require to
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 16:30:24 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 11/24/2017 03:58 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/24/2017 02:27 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:01:20 +0100
> >> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
On 11/24/2017 03:58 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 11/24/2017 02:27 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:01:20 +0100
>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>> I first liked the idea to have it as a property of the css, but
>>> this is all pretty
On 11/24/2017 02:27 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:01:20 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> I first liked the idea to have it as a property of the css, but
>> this is all pretty unclear how to do right. I start to think that going with
>>
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:01:20 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> I first liked the idea to have it as a property of the css, but
> this is all pretty unclear how to do right. I start to think that going with
> Halils first patch (a property per virtio device) is going
On 11/24/2017 01:46 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:33:56 +0100
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> Having an adequate representation for the css in QOM would be certainly
>> interesting, but at the same time (IMHO) is somewhat challenging. Let me
>> make some
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:33:56 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
> Having an adequate representation for the css in QOM would be certainly
> interesting, but at the same time (IMHO) is somewhat challenging. Let me
> make some observations, which should some of my concerns.
>
>
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:09:16 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
[I need time to process your other remarks.]
> On 11/22/2017 01:13 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> Also I can't find anything about vfio-ccw in the upstream users
> >> manual for 2.10.91.
> >
> > We have an
On 11/22/2017 01:13 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
[..]
>> The original question was about weather keep the start putting
>> non-virtual devices into (the non-guest-visible) 0 if no devno is
>> specified, or rather fill the default first and only then spill
>> to the next css.
>
> Combined with what
On 11/22/2017 05:25 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:45:56 +0100
> Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
>
>> On 11/22/2017 01:13 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
+object_class_property_add_bool(klass, "cssid-unrestricted",
+
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:45:56 +0100
Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 01:13 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> +object_class_property_add_bool(klass, "cssid-unrestricted",
> >> + prop_get_true, NULL, NULL);
> > This
On 11/22/2017 01:13 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
+object_class_property_add_bool(klass, "cssid-unrestricted",
+ prop_get_true, NULL, NULL);
This looks really, really strange. This is a property that is always
true if it exists.
Won't argue about that.
On 11/21/2017 12:18 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
The default css 0xFE is currently restricted to virtual subchannel
devices. The hope when the decision was made was, that non-virtual
subchannel devices will come around when guest can exploit multiple
channel subsystems. Since the guests generally
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 19:10:15 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 11/21/2017 05:06 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:45:17 +0100
> > Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/21/2017 02:44 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>>
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 18:05:46 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 11/21/2017 05:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:47:29 +0100
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/21/2017 02:44 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 21 Nov
On 11/21/2017 05:06 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:45:17 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> On 11/21/2017 02:44 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:18:25 +0100
>>> Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
>>> Subject:
On 11/21/2017 05:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:47:29 +0100
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> On 11/21/2017 02:44 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:18:25 +0100
>>> Halil Pasic wrote:
[..]
>>>
>>> - Add a
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:47:29 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 11/21/2017 02:44 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:18:25 +0100
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> > Subject: s/unresrict/unrestrict/
>
> Sure!
>
> >
> >> The
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:45:17 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 11/21/2017 02:44 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:18:25 +0100
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> > Subject: s/unresrict/unrestrict/
> >
> >> The default css
On 11/21/2017 02:44 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:18:25 +0100
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
> Subject: s/unresrict/unrestrict/
Sure!
>
>> The default css 0xFE is currently restricted to virtual subchannel
>> devices. The hope when the decision was made
On 11/21/2017 02:44 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:18:25 +0100
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
> Subject: s/unresrict/unrestrict/
>
>> The default css 0xFE is currently restricted to virtual subchannel
>> devices. The hope when the decision was made was,
On 11/21/2017 02:44 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:18:25 +0100
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
> Subject: s/unresrict/unrestrict/
>
>> The default css 0xFE is currently restricted to virtual subchannel
>> devices. The hope when the decision was made was,
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:18:25 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
Subject: s/unresrict/unrestrict/
> The default css 0xFE is currently restricted to virtual subchannel
> devices. The hope when the decision was made was, that non-virtual
> subchannel devices will come around when
50 matches
Mail list logo