On 1 December 2016 at 12:19, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/12/16 12:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 1 December 2016 at 11:28, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> I don't think so. At least here as a _variable_ type uint32_t is
>>> probably the right one, as the ARMv8 ARM explicitly says that PMCR is
Hi,
On 01/12/16 12:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 December 2016 at 11:28, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> I don't think so. At least here as a _variable_ type uint32_t is
>> probably the right one, as the ARMv8 ARM explicitly says that PMCR is a
>> 32-bit register, for both bitnesses.
>
> For 64-bit A
On 1 December 2016 at 11:28, Andre Przywara wrote:
> I don't think so. At least here as a _variable_ type uint32_t is
> probably the right one, as the ARMv8 ARM explicitly says that PMCR is a
> 32-bit register, for both bitnesses.
For 64-bit ARM this is strictly speaking just shorthand for "64-bi
Hi,
On 01/12/16 09:03, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:16:40PM -0600, Wei Huang wrote:
>> From: Christopher Covington
>>
>> Beginning with a simple sanity check of the control register, add
>> a unit test for the ARM Performance Monitors Unit (PMU). PMU register
>> was read using
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:16:40PM -0600, Wei Huang wrote:
> From: Christopher Covington
>
> Beginning with a simple sanity check of the control register, add
> a unit test for the ARM Performance Monitors Unit (PMU). PMU register
> was read using the newly defined macros.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chr
