Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 20/09/2016 13:04, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> I'm not proposing to get rid of -serial. I'm proposing to use it as
>> indicator of old code in need of modernization. A properly QOMified
>> serial device should be "configurable with non-legacy
Andreas Färber writes:
> Am 20.09.2016 um 10:08 schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>
>>> If we're going to aim for deprecating and eventually removing
>>> some of our unmaintained device and board models, it seems to
>>> me that a
Am 20.09.2016 um 10:08 schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> If we're going to aim for deprecating and eventually removing
>> some of our unmaintained device and board models, it seems to
>> me that a good first step would be to come up with a
On 20/09/2016 13:04, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> I'm not proposing to get rid of -serial. I'm proposing to use it as
> indicator of old code in need of modernization. A properly QOMified
> serial device should be "configurable with non-legacy means". Devices
> that aren't are probably not
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 20/09/2016 10:08, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>
>>> If we're going to aim for deprecating and eventually removing
>>> some of our unmaintained device and board models, it seems to
>>> me that a
On 20/09/2016 10:08, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> If we're going to aim for deprecating and eventually removing
>> some of our unmaintained device and board models, it seems to
>> me that a good first step would be to come up with a definition
Peter Maydell writes:
> If we're going to aim for deprecating and eventually removing
> some of our unmaintained device and board models, it seems to
> me that a good first step would be to come up with a definition
> of what our baseline "needs to be at least this