On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 08:03:50AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> So if changing netdev parameters on the fly is something that we want, we
> should implement this properly instead indeed, and not via such an
> accidental bug.
How to do it is a separate thing, users don't really care at all.
--
MST
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 08:03:50AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 15/12/2021 04.31, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:53 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:02:15AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > On 10/12/2021 18.02, Alexand
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 07:48:06AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Jason Wang writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:53 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:02:15AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> > On 10/12/2021 18.02, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
On 15/12/2021 04.31, Jason Wang wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:53 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:02:15AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
Hi!
On 10/12/2021 18.02, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
With QEMU 5 I could totally issue a QMP netdev_add
with the same ID to adjust t
Jason Wang writes:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:53 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:02:15AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > On 10/12/2021 18.02, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>> > > With QEMU 5 I could totally issue a QMP netdev_add
>> > > with the same ID
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:53 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:02:15AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On 10/12/2021 18.02, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> > > With QEMU 5 I could totally issue a QMP netdev_add
> > > with the same ID to adjust the NetdevUserOption
I was wondering will Qemu Linux ever be able to emulate Apple Silicon,
modified Arm? The reason why I ask is because Open Core is now dead to me
and many other users because Apple has decided to switch to their own CPUs
and GPUs. I have an Intel based system still and I still want to be able to
upd
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:02:15AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 10/12/2021 18.02, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> > With QEMU 5 I could totally issue a QMP netdev_add
> > with the same ID to adjust the NetdevUserOptions I want,
> > such as restrict or hostfwd. No deleting needed,
> > just a
On 12/13/21 17:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> KVM on big.little setups is a kernel-level question really; I've
>> cc'd the kvmarm list.
>
> Thanks Peter for throwing us under the big-little bus! ;-)
>
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 15:02,
On 12/14/21 01:41, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
>> Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>
>>> KVM on big.little setups is a kernel-level question really; I've
>>> cc'd the kvmarm list.
>>
>> Thanks Peter for throwing us under the big-li
Hi,
Can I know how these "values" are written
https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/stable-6.0/hw/char/pl011.c#L33-#L39. I
tried to check and read from the reference manual but I did not get it?
Please let me know.
BR.
Abhijeet.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 5:14 PM Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 06:59:12PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/12/14 18:36, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:34:18AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:41:01 +,
> > > Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/12/14 00:4
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:21:40 +,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
> On 2021/12/14 17:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > The best workaround is to taskset the QEMU process (and I really mean
> > the process, not individual threads) to an homogeneous set of CPUs and
> > be done with it.
>
> Yeah, that's why the cpuset
On 2021/12/14 18:36, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:34:18AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:41:01 +,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
Peter Maydell wrote:
KVM on big.little setups
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:34:18AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:41:01 +,
> Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
> > > Peter Maydell wrote:
> > >>
> > >> KVM on big.little setups is a kern
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:08:29 +,
Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 09:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > The best workaround is to taskset the QEMU process (and I really mean
> > the process, not individual threads) to an homogeneous set of CPUs and
> > be done with it.
>
> Agreed. I
On 2021/12/14 17:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:16:40 +,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/12/14 15:53, Michal Prívozník wrote:
On 12/14/21 01:41, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
Peter Maydell wrote:
KVM on b
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 09:52, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> You are still missing the point of how QEMU works:
>
> - QEMU creates a dummy VM with a single vcpu. This can happen on *any*
> CPU.
> - It snapshots the sysregs for this vcpu, and keep them for later
> - It then destroy this VM
> - QEMU then c
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:16:40 +,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/12/14 15:53, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> > On 12/14/21 01:41, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
> >>> Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> KVM on
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:41:01 +,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
> > Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>
> >> KVM on big.little setups is a kernel-level question really; I've
> >> cc'd the kvmarm list.
> >
> > Thanks Peter fo
On 2021/12/14 15:53, Michal Prívozník wrote:
On 12/14/21 01:41, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/12/14 00:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:14 +,
Peter Maydell wrote:
KVM on big.little setups is a kernel-level question really; I've
cc'd the kvmarm list.
Thanks Peter for th
21 matches
Mail list logo
