Re: [Qemu-discuss]  qcow2 performanceimprove 

2018-08-23 Thread yang.bin18
> > > > > If there is no backing file or snapshot you still need to fill > > > > > the cluster with zeroes, and that's going to be slower with > > > > > larger clusters. > > > > If not fill zeroes and only write guest data ,what`s wrong could > > > > happen ? > > > The following could

Re: [Qemu-discuss]  qcow2 performanceimprove 

2018-08-17 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:28:49AM +0800, yang.bi...@zte.com.cn wrote: > > > > If there is no backing file or snapshot you still need to fill > > > > the cluster with zeroes, and that's going to be slower with > > > > larger clusters. > > > If not fill zeroes and only write guest data ,what`s

Re: [Qemu-discuss]  qcow2 performanceimprove

2018-08-16 Thread Jakob Bohm
On 17/08/2018 04:28, yang.bi...@zte.com.cn wrote: If there is no backing file or snapshot you still need to fill the>>>cluster with zeroes, and that's going to be slower with larger>>>clusters. If not fill zeroes and only write guest data ,what`s wrong could>> happen ?>The

Re: [Qemu-discuss]  qcow2 performanceimprove 

2018-08-16 Thread yang.bin18
>>>If there is no backing file or snapshot you still need to fill the>>>cluster >>>with zeroes, and that's going to be slower with larger>>>clusters. >>>If not fill zeroes and only write guest data ,what`s wrong could>> >>>happen ?>The following could happen:> 1) Guest reads at