On 05-01-16 15:59, DelazJ wrote:
> Thank you for the invitation and giving me these rights. I promise I'll
> use it cleverly :)
>
> @ Richard, not all the issue reports were to be closed without checking:
> I couldn't rule on the state of #46, #43, #42, #33 (all related to build
> process but I
Hi,
Below is a list of issue reports that have been fixed but are still open in
their repo.
WEBSITE repo:
#169, #89
#272, #241 seem invalid (related to QGIS Desktop)
State of #46, #43, #42, #33?
DOCUMENTATION repo:
#661, #644, #601, #599, #596, #594, #592 (?), #589, #588, #567
Thanks to close
On 05-01-16 14:54, DelazJ wrote:
> Hi,
> Below is a list of issue reports that have been fixed but are still open
> in their repo.
>
> WEBSITE repo:
> #169, #89
> #272, #241 seem invalid (related to QGIS Desktop)
> State of #46, #43, #42, #33?
>
> DOCUMENTATION repo:
> #661, #644, #601, #599,
On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 14:58:38 Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
> On 05-01-16 14:54, DelazJ wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Below is a list of issue reports that have been fixed but are still open
> > in their repo.
> >
> > WEBSITE repo:
> > #169, #89
> > #272, #241 seem invalid (related to QGIS Desktop)
>
Thank you for the invitation and giving me these rights. I promise I'll use
it cleverly :)
@ Richard, not all the issue reports were to be closed without checking: I
couldn't rule on the state of #46, #43, #42, #33 (all related to build
process but I didn't face them once and wonder if the
