On 20 June 2014 15:43, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually the dot syntax would imply on the fly evaluation. When
parsing, it is not possible to decide what will be the content of an
object.
This would be similar to python: the expression x.y means that in
object x it should
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Nyall Dawson nyall.daw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 June 2014 15:43, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually the dot syntax would imply on the fly evaluation. When
parsing, it is not possible to decide what will be the content of an
object.
This
On 23-05-14 22:33, Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi all
Feature freeze is here and I would like to start compiling the visual
changelog for QGIS 2.4.0 'Chugiak'.
I have set up a new version
on http://changelog.linfiniti.com/qgis/version/2.4.0/
also note that we are in the middle of pulling the atom
Hi Giovanni,
Could you give us the link to the issue on the hub ? I really think this is
a nasty one.
Thanks
Michael
2014-06-19 20:33 GMT+02:00 Giovanni Manghi giovanni.man...@faunalia.pt:
Hi devs,
I have a projet with many layers (about 100). When I open it under QGIS
2.2, I can save
Hi
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net wrote:
I would propose to have two more weeks for stabilizing things.
Yesterday we had the Swiss QGIS user meeting. We had workshops with QGIS
master. While the features are great, there were still some issues that
need
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Datum Transformation - parameters for
mainland Portugal
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:35:00 +0200
From: Marco Hugentobler marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch
To: Pedro Venâncio pedrongvenan...@yahoo.com
Hi Pedro
Added two
I think #10379 is related (read the last updates).
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
I would suggest max. 7 days (without affecting the schedule of the
next release).
+1
2014-06-20 10:33 GMT+02:00 Luca Manganelli luc...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
I would
On 20 June 2014 10:33, Luca Manganelli luc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
I would suggest max.
Hi Micheal
Could you give us the link to the issue on the hub ? I really think this is
a nasty one.
I didn't filed one yet, I'm trying to understand at what point the
issue arises when adding layers.
Cheers!
--
Giovanni Manghi
Faunalia.pt
Sistemas de Informação Geográfica Open Source
Hi Paolo,
Does the issue still exist ?
I take a look at the map application and roads are well rendering.
Regards,
Le 19/06/2014 12:50, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
Hi all.
Apparently items whose classification name includes high ASCII (àèé etc.) are
drawn
and shown in the legend, but not on
Il 20/06/2014 10:51, René-Luc Dhont ha scritto:
Does the issue still exist ?
I take a look at the map application and roads are well rendering.
Yes, the underlying issue is still there. I kind of solved for that application
simply using an INT field, and applying labels to it.
All the best.
+1
giovanni
Il 20/giu/2014 10:39 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com ha scritto:
On 20 June 2014 10:33, Luca Manganelli luc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
There
Le 20/06/2014 11:07, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
Il 20/06/2014 10:51, René-Luc Dhont ha scritto:
Does the issue still exist ?
I take a look at the map application and roads are well rendering.
Yes, the underlying issue is still there. I kind of solved for that application
simply using an INT
+1
Best regards,
Pedro Venâncio
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
On 20/06/2014 5:43 pm, Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
I would suggest max. 7 days (without affecting the schedule of the
next release).
If Martin
+1
On 06/20/2014 10:43 AM, Martin Dobias wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Andreas Neumann a.neum...@carto.net wrote:
I would propose to have two more weeks for stabilizing things.
Yesterday we had the Swiss QGIS user meeting. We had workshops with QGIS
master. While the features
Il 20/06/2014 11:15, René-Luc Dhont ha scritto:
It's probably due to different encoding in desktop (Latin1), server (UTF-8)
and data
(Latin1)
good catch, thanks.
I think we should handle this more gracefully, however. For the end user this
would
be very difficult to solve.
All the best.
--
Le 20/06/2014 12:41, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
Il 20/06/2014 11:15, René-Luc Dhont ha scritto:
It's probably due to different encoding in desktop (Latin1), server (UTF-8) and
data
(Latin1)
good catch, thanks.
I think we should handle this more gracefully, however. For the end user this
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de wrote:
Hi Tudor,
On Thu, 19. Jun 2014 at 13:15:51 +0300, tudor yahoo wrote:
Since 2.3 got out, QGIS asks the credentials for the database connection from
time to time (sometimes, instead of credentials box the project simply
freezes).
Hi Marco.
Added two ntv2 entries and updated two entries, hope it is correct now.
Great Marco, it is working now with ntv2 grids.
Since there is now a duplication, I think you can delete the grids entry with
coord_op_code 14 and 17.
I still feel uncomfortable to delete / update
Since there is now a duplication, I think you can delete the grids entry with
coord_op_code 14 and 17.
With which other entries are they duplicated? Seems to me there are no two
entries with same source_srs / dest_src / gsb file ?
No, those parameters that have +towgs84=565.04(...)
Hi
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Giovanni Manghi
giovanni.man...@faunalia.pt wrote:
Hi Micheal
Could you give us the link to the issue on the hub ? I really think this is
a nasty one.
I didn't filed one yet, I'm trying to understand at what point the
issue arises when adding layers.
I
Hi again,
- Mensagem original -
DE: Pedro Venâncio
However I came across something quite odd. In the Datum
Transformation window, automatically arise some strange transformations (red
in
the image http://goo.gl/iIWOuw). These transformations give huge errors, and
I
do
I have a project with ~100 layers and did not noticed such behavior.
Both on Ubuntu and Windows.
Cheers,
Denis
On 20.06.2014 13:45, Martin Dobias wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Giovanni Manghi
giovanni.man...@faunalia.pt wrote:
Hi Micheal
Could you give us the link to the
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 20. Jun 2014 at 14:43:22 +0700, Martin Dobias wrote:
I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
I would suggest max. 7 days (without affecting the schedule of the
next release).
So
Thanks Jurgen.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 20. Jun 2014 at 14:43:22 +0700, Martin Dobias wrote:
I agree with Andreas. Can we postpone the release for a few days?
There is still quite steady flow of new bug reports worth addressing.
Hi,
Thans for you help, I will try to setup the problematic project and publish
it somewhere whenever I find the time.
Michael
2014-06-20 13:50 GMT+02:00 Denis Rouzaud denis.rouz...@gmail.com:
I have a project with ~100 layers and did not noticed such behavior.
Both on Ubuntu and Windows.
Hi Marco,
Since there is now a duplication, I think you can delete the grids entry
with coord_op_code 14 and 17.
With which other entries are they duplicated? Seems to me there are no two
entries with same source_srs / dest_src / gsb file ?
coord_op_code 14 uses the
Am 20.06.2014 13:41, schrieb Marco Hugentobler:
No, those parameters that have +towgs84=565.04(...) are not associated
with any portuguese transformation. These parameters belong to epsg_nr
1571. The only point of contact between this entry and the portuguese
entries, is that both uses 4258
Hi all,
I have a couple of doubts about diagrams:
* their scale dependent visibility does not seems to work
* while there is a font button, this seems to only work with text
diagrams but not for pie and histogram ones
anyone can confirm?
cheers
-- G --
I can confirm it's not working under windows at least installing from OSGEO4W
32 bit
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/edit-widgets-do-not-work-in-current-master-tp5146847p5147085.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
33 matches
Mail list logo
