Hi Hugo
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Hugo Mercier hugo.merc...@oslandia.com
wrote:
Hi,
When labeling is enabled on a layer, then the rendering cache is made
invalid and everything is computed for rendering.
I may be missing something obvious, but I don't understand why.
Is it because
Hi Martin,
Le 19/12/2014 09:26, Martin Dobias a écrit :
Hi Hugo
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Hugo Mercier
hugo.merc...@oslandia.com mailto:hugo.merc...@oslandia.com wrote:
Hi,
When labeling is enabled on a layer, then the rendering cache is made
invalid and everything
Hi Sandro
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:46:21PM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
The weird looking aspect seems to be due to a discrepancy between
the actual legend image size and the space reserved for it.
In practice I
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Hugo Mercier hugo.merc...@oslandia.com
wrote:
Suppose I have an uncached layer with labeling switched on.
During the first rendering, everything is drawn, including labels.
During the second rendering (same extent), the cache could be reused and
it would
Le 19/12/2014 09:42, Martin Dobias a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Hugo Mercier hugo.merc...@oslandia.com
mailto:hugo.merc...@oslandia.com wrote:
Suppose I have an uncached layer with labeling switched on.
During the first rendering, everything is drawn, including
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:35:39PM +0700, Martin Dobias wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:46:21PM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
The weird looking aspect seems to be due to a discrepancy between
the actual legend
Hi,
Suppose I have an uncached layer with labeling switched on.
During the first rendering, everything is drawn, including labels.
During the second rendering (same extent), the cache could be reused and
it would include labels previously drawn during the first rendering. No ?
No... the
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:34:34AM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:35:39PM +0700, Martin Dobias wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:46:21PM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
The weird
Hi Paolo: FYI we have now merged MetaSearch into QGIS core. Can you
try now from there?
Thanks
..Tom
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Just upgraded Metasearch, I'm consistently getting this
I've completed an enhancement proposal for adding support for contextual
WMS legends: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/pull/15
(to read online: Files changed - View)
The code reflecting the QEP as a single commit is ready here:
https://github.com/strk/qgis/tree/wmslegend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Il 19/12/2014 18:14, Sandro Santilli ha scritto:
I've completed an enhancement proposal for adding support for
contextual WMS legends:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/pull/15 (to read
online: Files changed - View)
11 matches
Mail list logo